As a last minute addition, I added an assertion to make sure that the new i915_vma view would be equal to the discard. However, the positive encouragement from CI only goes to show that we rarely take this path, and it wasn't until the post-merge run did we hit the assert. Fixes: 9bdcaa5e3a2f ("drm/i915: Discard a misplaced GGTT vma") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index f1acd1889d37..41553e9e57a9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c @@ -947,7 +947,8 @@ discard_ggtt_vma(struct i915_vma *vma, const struct i915_ggtt_view *view) rb_erase(&vma->obj_node, &obj->vma.tree); vma->ggtt_view = discard; - GEM_BUG_ON(i915_vma_compare(vma, vma->vm, view)); + GEM_BUG_ON(i915_vma_compare(vma, vma->vm, &discard)); + GEM_BUG_ON(i915_vma_compare(vma, vma->vm, view) == 0); rb = NULL; p = &obj->vma.tree.rb_node; -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx