On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 11:56, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Across the many users of the GGTT vma (internal objects, mmapings, > display etc), we may end up with conflicting requirements for the > placement. Currently, we try to resolve the conflict by unbinding the > vma and rebinding it to match the new constraints; over time we will end > up with a GGTT that matches the most strict constraints over all > concurrent users. However, this causes a problem if the vma is currently > in use as we must wait until it is idle before moving it. But there is > no restriction on the number of views we may use (apart from the limited > size of the GGTT itself), and so if the active vma does not meet our > requirements, try and build a new one! > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Heebie-jeebies aside, Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
