Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2020-05-29 15:24:17) > Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Across the many users of the GGTT vma (internal objects, mmapings, > > display etc), we may end up with conflicting requirements for the > > placement. Currently, we try to resolve the conflict by unbinding the > > vma and rebinding it to match the new constraints; over time we will end > > up with a GGTT that matches the most strict constraints over all > > concurrent users. However, this causes a problem if the vma is currently > > in use as we must wait until it is idle before moving it. But there is > > no restriction on the number of views we may (apart from the limited > > we may...have/impose? we may have/create/use >From the object point-of-view, there is a presumption that is a single normal view with as many partials as required (one expects up to obj->size/chunk_size). -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
