Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Reduce the irq_work llist for attaching the callbacks to the signal for > both smaller structs (two fewer pointers!) and simpler [debug] code: > > Function old new delta > irq_execute_cb 35 34 -1 > __igt_breadcrumbs_smoketest 1684 1682 -2 > i915_request_retire 2003 1996 -7 > __i915_request_create 1047 1040 -7 > __notify_execute_cb 135 126 -9 > __i915_request_ctor 188 178 -10 > __await_execution.part.constprop 451 440 -11 > igt_wait_request 924 714 -210 > > One minor artifact is that the order of cb exection is reversed. No > current use cases are affected by that change. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 18 +++++++++--------- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c > index c282719ad3ac..22df5b229aed 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c > @@ -42,7 +42,6 @@ > #include "intel_pm.h" > > struct execute_cb { > - struct list_head link; > struct irq_work work; > struct i915_sw_fence *fence; > void (*hook)(struct i915_request *rq, struct dma_fence *signal); > @@ -189,14 +188,14 @@ static void irq_execute_cb_hook(struct irq_work *wrk) > > static void __notify_execute_cb(struct i915_request *rq) > { > - struct execute_cb *cb; > + struct execute_cb *cb, *cn; > > lockdep_assert_held(&rq->lock); > > - if (list_empty(&rq->execute_cb)) > + if (llist_empty(&rq->execute_cb)) > return; > > - list_for_each_entry(cb, &rq->execute_cb, link) > + llist_for_each_entry_safe(cb, cn, rq->execute_cb.first, work.llnode) > irq_work_queue(&cb->work); > > /* > @@ -209,7 +208,7 @@ static void __notify_execute_cb(struct i915_request *rq) > * preempt-to-idle cycle on the target engine, all the while the > * master execute_cb may refire. > */ > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->execute_cb); > + rq->execute_cb.first = NULL; > } > > static inline void > @@ -327,7 +326,7 @@ bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq) > set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_ACTIVE, &rq->fence.flags); > __notify_execute_cb(rq); > } > - GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->execute_cb)); > + GEM_BUG_ON(!llist_empty(&rq->execute_cb)); > spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock); > > remove_from_client(rq); > @@ -395,7 +394,8 @@ __await_execution(struct i915_request *rq, > i915_sw_fence_complete(cb->fence); > kmem_cache_free(global.slab_execute_cbs, cb); > } else { > - list_add_tail(&cb->link, &signal->execute_cb); > + cb->work.llnode.next = signal->execute_cb.first; > + signal->execute_cb.first = &cb->work.llnode; With this part giving more glues as of why can we do this, Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > } > spin_unlock_irq(&signal->lock); > > @@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ static void __i915_request_ctor(void *arg) > rq->file_priv = NULL; > rq->capture_list = NULL; > > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->execute_cb); > + init_llist_head(&rq->execute_cb); > } > > struct i915_request * > @@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ __i915_request_create(struct intel_context *ce, gfp_t gfp) > rq->batch = NULL; > GEM_BUG_ON(rq->file_priv); > GEM_BUG_ON(rq->capture_list); > - GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->execute_cb)); > + GEM_BUG_ON(!llist_empty(&rq->execute_cb)); > > /* > * Reserve space in the ring buffer for all the commands required to > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h > index 8ec7ee4dbadc..5d4709a3dace 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h > @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ struct i915_request { > ktime_t emitted; > } duration; > }; > - struct list_head execute_cb; > + struct llist_head execute_cb; > struct i915_sw_fence semaphore; > > /* > -- > 2.20.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx