Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev18)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have seen those failures in other patches as well, i.e before my patches landed.

Best Regards,

Lisovskiy Stanislav

Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

________________________________________
From: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2020 2:18:44 AM
To: Lisovskiy, Stanislav; Vudum, Lakshminarayana; intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:   ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev18)

Quoting Chris Wilson (2020-05-22 23:00:10)
> Quoting Lisovskiy, Stanislav (2020-05-21 10:35:42)
> > Seems to be unrelated issue. There seems to be some list corruption happening in drm fb manipulation code.
> > if those patches would be causing that (like some severe mem corruption)- it would happen much more broadly than single test and single platform. Moreover there is no direct  connection to the changes.
>
> The fi-glk-dsi failure in module reload is a result of this series.
> Somehow you have angered the i915 pm around snd_hda_intel.
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17733/fi-glk-dsi/igt@i915_pm_rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

CI says "drm/i915: Adjust CDCLK accordingly to our DBuf bw needs" is the
culprit.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux