Re: [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915/gt: Kick virtual siblings on timeslice out

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 18/05/2020 09:14, Chris Wilson wrote:
If we decide to timeslice out the current virtual request, we will
unsubmit it while it is still busy (ve->context.inflight == sibling[0]).
If the virtual tasklet and then the other sibling tasklets run before we
completely schedule out the active virtual request for the preemption,
those other tasklets will see that the virtul request is still inflight
on sibling[0] and leave it be. Therefore when we finally schedule-out
the virtual request and if we see that we have passed it back to the
virtual engine, reschedule the virtual tasklet so that it may be
resubmitted on any of the siblings.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index 80885ba87db5..05486e801a63 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@ static void kick_siblings(struct i915_request *rq, struct intel_context *ce)
  	struct virtual_engine *ve = container_of(ce, typeof(*ve), context);
  	struct i915_request *next = READ_ONCE(ve->request);
- if (next && next->execution_mask & ~rq->execution_mask)
+	if (next == rq || (next && next->execution_mask & ~rq->execution_mask))
  		tasklet_hi_schedule(&ve->base.execlists.tasklet);
  }

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux