On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 8:42 AM Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 17:24, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Resending because last attempt failed CI and meanwhile the results are > > lost :-/ > > Did anything happen with this? Nope. There's an igt now that fails with this, and I'm not sure whether changing the igt is the right idea or not. I'm kinda now thinking about changing this to instead document under which exact situations you can get a spurious EBUSY, and enforcing that in the code with some checks. Essentially only possible if you do a ALLOW_MODESET | NONBLOCKING on the other crtc. And then tell userspace you get to eat that. We've been shipping with this for so long by now that's defacto the uapi anyway :-/ Thoughts? Too horrible? -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
