Re: [PATCH v28 3/6] drm/i915: Make active_pipes check skl specific

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 02:39:25PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 05:45:00PM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > Seems that only skl needs to have SAGV turned off
> > for multipipe scenarios, so lets do it this way.
> 
> It doesn't afaics. It's just someone added the check for some random
> reason. So this should be reworded a bit. Also this isn't just about
> skl/derivatives but all pre-icl so the <subject> is a bit misleading too.

This is in BSpec anyway. And it was in the code before, so I really 
don't get what do you mean here.

> 
> > 
> > If anything blows up - we can always revert this patch.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 15 +++++++++------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h |  3 ++-
> >  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index 3dc1ad66beb3..db188efee21e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -3777,7 +3777,7 @@ void intel_sagv_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> >  	if (!new_bw_state)
> >  		return;
> >  
> > -	if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(new_bw_state))
> > +	if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state))
> >  		intel_disable_sagv(dev_priv);
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -3800,7 +3800,7 @@ void intel_sagv_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> >  	if (!new_bw_state)
> >  		return;
> >  
> > -	if (intel_can_enable_sagv(new_bw_state))
> > +	if (intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state))
> >  		intel_enable_sagv(dev_priv);
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -3853,16 +3853,19 @@ static bool skl_crtc_can_enable_sagv(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >  	return true;
> >  }
> >  
> > -bool intel_can_enable_sagv(const struct intel_bw_state *bw_state)
> > +bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > +			   const struct intel_bw_state *bw_state)
> >  {
> > -	if (bw_state->active_pipes && !is_power_of_2(bw_state->active_pipes))
> > -		return false;
> > +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11)
> > +		if (bw_state->active_pipes && !is_power_of_2(bw_state->active_pipes))
> 
> If (a && b && c)
> 	return false;

Then the line would get too long, and it does exactly same thing.
I really don't understand such comments.

Stan

> 
> 
> > +			return false;
> >  
> >  	return bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject == 0;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int intel_compute_sagv_mask(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> >  {
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> >  	int ret;
> >  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> >  	const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
> > @@ -3896,7 +3899,7 @@ static int intel_compute_sagv_mask(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> >  			return ret;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (intel_can_enable_sagv(new_bw_state) != intel_can_enable_sagv(old_bw_state)) {
> > +	if (intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state) != intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, old_bw_state)) {
> 
> >  		ret = intel_atomic_serialize_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
> >  		if (ret)
> >  			return ret;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h
> > index fd1dc422e6c5..614ac7f8d4cc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h
> > @@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ void skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> >  			      struct skl_pipe_wm *out);
> >  void g4x_wm_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> >  void vlv_wm_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> > -bool intel_can_enable_sagv(const struct intel_bw_state *bw_state);
> > +bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > +			   const struct intel_bw_state *bw_state);
> >  int intel_enable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> >  int intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> >  void intel_sagv_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
> > -- 
> > 2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux