On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 02:39:25PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 05:45:00PM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote: > > Seems that only skl needs to have SAGV turned off > > for multipipe scenarios, so lets do it this way. > > It doesn't afaics. It's just someone added the check for some random > reason. So this should be reworded a bit. Also this isn't just about > skl/derivatives but all pre-icl so the <subject> is a bit misleading too. This is in BSpec anyway. And it was in the code before, so I really don't get what do you mean here. > > > > > If anything blows up - we can always revert this patch. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 15 +++++++++------ > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h | 3 ++- > > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > > index 3dc1ad66beb3..db188efee21e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > > @@ -3777,7 +3777,7 @@ void intel_sagv_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state) > > if (!new_bw_state) > > return; > > > > - if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(new_bw_state)) > > + if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state)) > > intel_disable_sagv(dev_priv); > > } > > > > @@ -3800,7 +3800,7 @@ void intel_sagv_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state) > > if (!new_bw_state) > > return; > > > > - if (intel_can_enable_sagv(new_bw_state)) > > + if (intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state)) > > intel_enable_sagv(dev_priv); > > } > > > > @@ -3853,16 +3853,19 @@ static bool skl_crtc_can_enable_sagv(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) > > return true; > > } > > > > -bool intel_can_enable_sagv(const struct intel_bw_state *bw_state) > > +bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > + const struct intel_bw_state *bw_state) > > { > > - if (bw_state->active_pipes && !is_power_of_2(bw_state->active_pipes)) > > - return false; > > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11) > > + if (bw_state->active_pipes && !is_power_of_2(bw_state->active_pipes)) > > If (a && b && c) > return false; Then the line would get too long, and it does exactly same thing. I really don't understand such comments. Stan > > > > + return false; > > > > return bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject == 0; > > } > > > > static int intel_compute_sagv_mask(struct intel_atomic_state *state) > > { > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev); > > int ret; > > struct intel_crtc *crtc; > > const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state; > > @@ -3896,7 +3899,7 @@ static int intel_compute_sagv_mask(struct intel_atomic_state *state) > > return ret; > > } > > > > - if (intel_can_enable_sagv(new_bw_state) != intel_can_enable_sagv(old_bw_state)) { > > + if (intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state) != intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, old_bw_state)) { > > > ret = intel_atomic_serialize_global_state(&new_bw_state->base); > > if (ret) > > return ret; > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h > > index fd1dc422e6c5..614ac7f8d4cc 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h > > @@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ void skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc, > > struct skl_pipe_wm *out); > > void g4x_wm_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); > > void vlv_wm_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); > > -bool intel_can_enable_sagv(const struct intel_bw_state *bw_state); > > +bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > + const struct intel_bw_state *bw_state); > > int intel_enable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); > > int intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); > > void intel_sagv_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state); > > -- > > 2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5 > > -- > Ville Syrjälä > Intel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx