Quoting Matthew Auld (2020-05-01 15:58:29)
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 20:42, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > + ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, pid, NULL, NULL);
> > + for (int i = 0; i < OBJECT_SIZE / sizeof(long); i++) {
> > + long ret;
> > +
> > + ret = ptrace(PTRACE_PEEKDATA, pid, gtt + i);
> > + igt_assert_eq_u64(ret, CC);
> > + cpy[i] = ret;
> > +
> > + ret = ptrace(PTRACE_POKEDATA, pid, gtt + i, AA);
> > + igt_assert_eq(ret, 0l);
>
> igt_assert_eq_u64() ?
In this case it will either be 0 or -1 + errno.
So "%d" vs "%llx" should not affect debugging.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
