On Wed, 29 Apr 2020, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:27:50PM -0400, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote: >> Add three new devices 0x1513, 0x1515, and 0x1517 also known as > > typo 0x15 vs. 0x19 > >> iSKLULTGT15, iSKLULXGT15, and iSKLDTGT15. Reclassify 0x1923, 0x1927, >> and 0x192A according to specifications. > > I'd make this three separate patches, just in case we have to revert > some of these in the future. Most worried about the 0x192a case since > the evidence is rather poor. I fixed the typo. The absence of 0x192a from the most recent Windows drivers indicates that it was never printed. The absence of evidence is the evidence of absence. The second to last digit indicates that it was planned as GT3. Lastly, making 3 patches for something non-existent is such an overkill. These are trivial to revert line-by-line too. Please be considerate to occasional helpers and do not ask to much of them. Regards, Alexei _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
