Re: [PATCH v13 00/11] Convert PWM period and duty cycle to u64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 04:37:55PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 09:49:34AM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 07:57:12PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> > > [REQUEST]
> > > 
> > > Would it be possible for the patches that have already received Acked-by's in
> > > this series to be accepted and applied to the tree? I lost an Acked-by (in
> > > intel-panel.c) because it had a merge conflict with a new change that came in
> > > after I rebased to tip. I wasn't sure earlier about accepting single patches as
> > > opposed to the entire series en masse, but this event has got me thinking.
> > 
> > Has there been a positive maintainer review of patch 11 at any point in
> > the thread (most of the people you are asking to commit patches have
> > not been able to see the discussion about the actual feature these
> > patches are preparing for)?
> 
> Yes. Uwe had this to say [1] about a previous patchset (v5) of patch 11
> which is essentially unchanged in this patchset save the dropping of the
> pwm_capture change.
> 
> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pwm/msg11536.html

Excellent. Thanks!


Daniel.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux