On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 04:37:55PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 09:49:34AM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 07:57:12PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote: > > > [REQUEST] > > > > > > Would it be possible for the patches that have already received Acked-by's in > > > this series to be accepted and applied to the tree? I lost an Acked-by (in > > > intel-panel.c) because it had a merge conflict with a new change that came in > > > after I rebased to tip. I wasn't sure earlier about accepting single patches as > > > opposed to the entire series en masse, but this event has got me thinking. > > > > Has there been a positive maintainer review of patch 11 at any point in > > the thread (most of the people you are asking to commit patches have > > not been able to see the discussion about the actual feature these > > patches are preparing for)? > > Yes. Uwe had this to say [1] about a previous patchset (v5) of patch 11 > which is essentially unchanged in this patchset save the dropping of the > pwm_capture change. > > [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pwm/msg11536.html Excellent. Thanks! Daniel. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
