Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/selftests: Check RPS controls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Check that the GPU does respond to our RPS frequency requests by setting
> our desired frequency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_gt_pm.c |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c   | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.h   |   1 +
>  3 files changed, 174 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_gt_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_gt_pm.c
> index 4b2733967c42..de3eaef40596 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_gt_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_gt_pm.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ int intel_gt_pm_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>  {
>  	static const struct i915_subtest tests[] = {
>  		SUBTEST(live_rc6_manual),
> +		SUBTEST(live_rps_control),
>  		SUBTEST(live_rps_frequency),
>  		SUBTEST(live_rps_power),
>  		SUBTEST(live_rps_interrupt),
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c
> index 149a3de86cb9..19fa6a561de3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c
> @@ -107,6 +107,172 @@ create_spin_counter(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>  	return vma;
>  }
>  
> +static u8 rps_set_check(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 freq)
> +{
> +	u8 history[64], i;
> +	unsigned long end;
> +	int sleep;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(!rps->active);
> +	intel_rps_set(rps, freq);
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(rps->last_freq != freq);
> +	mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
> +
> +	i = 0;
> +	memset(history, freq, sizeof(history));
> +	sleep = 20;
> +
> +	/* The PCU does not change instantly, but drifts towards the goal? */
> +	end = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(50);
> +	do {
> +		u8 act;
> +
> +		act = read_cagf(rps);
> +		if (time_after(jiffies, end))
> +			return act;
> +
> +		/* Target acquired */
> +		if (act == freq)
> +			return act;
> +
> +		/* Any change witin the last N samples? */

within

> +		if (!memchr_inv(history, act, sizeof(history)))
> +			return act;
> +
> +		history[i] = act;
> +		i = (i + 1) % ARRAY_SIZE(history);
> +
> +		usleep_range(sleep, 2 * sleep);
> +		sleep *= 2;
> +		if (sleep > 1000)
> +			sleep = 1000;
> +	} while (1);
> +}
> +
> +int live_rps_control(void *arg)
> +{
> +	struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
> +	struct intel_rps *rps = &gt->rps;
> +	void (*saved_work)(struct work_struct *wrk);
> +	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> +	enum intel_engine_id id;
> +	struct igt_spinner spin;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Check that the actual frequency matches our requested frequency,
> +	 * to verify our control mechanism. We have to be careful that the
> +	 * PCU may throttle the GPU in which case the actual frequency used
> +	 * will be lowered than requested.
> +	 */
> +
> +	if (!rps->enabled || rps->max_freq <= rps->min_freq)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(gt->i915)) /* XXX fragile PCU */
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (igt_spinner_init(&spin, gt))
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	intel_gt_pm_wait_for_idle(gt);
> +	saved_work = rps->work.func;
> +	rps->work.func = dummy_rps_work;
> +
> +	intel_gt_pm_get(gt);
> +	for_each_engine(engine, gt, id) {
> +		struct i915_request *rq;
> +		ktime_t min_dt, max_dt;
> +		int act, f, limit;
> +		int min, max;
> +
> +		if (!intel_engine_can_store_dword(engine))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		rq = igt_spinner_create_request(&spin,
> +						engine->kernel_context,
> +						MI_NOOP);
> +		if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
> +			err = PTR_ERR(rq);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		i915_request_add(rq);
> +
> +		if (!igt_wait_for_spinner(&spin, rq)) {
> +			pr_err("%s: RPS spinner did not start\n",
> +			       engine->name);
> +			igt_spinner_end(&spin);
> +			intel_gt_set_wedged(engine->gt);
> +			err = -EIO;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (rps_set_check(rps, rps->min_freq) != rps->min_freq) {
> +			pr_err("%s: could not set minimum frequency [%x], only %x!\n",
> +			       engine->name, rps->min_freq, read_cagf(rps));
> +			igt_spinner_end(&spin);
> +			err = -EINVAL;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		for (f = rps->min_freq + 1; f < rps->max_freq; f++) {
> +			act = rps_set_check(rps, f);
> +			if (act < f)
> +				break;
> +		}

After discussion in irc, it seems we might have to settle that we
manage to get atleast one bin upwards and not have more expectations.

If/when issues get resolved, we might want to consider a minimum
limit of bins a hardware needs to reach instead of bin_zero + 1 :P

Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


> +
> +		limit = rps_set_check(rps, f);
> +
> +		if (rps_set_check(rps, rps->min_freq) != rps->min_freq) {
> +			pr_err("%s: could not restore minimum frequency [%x], only %x!\n",
> +			       engine->name, rps->min_freq, read_cagf(rps));
> +			igt_spinner_end(&spin);
> +			err = -EINVAL;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		max_dt = ktime_get();
> +		max = rps_set_check(rps, limit);
> +		max_dt = ktime_sub(ktime_get(), max_dt);
> +
> +		min_dt = ktime_get();
> +		min = rps_set_check(rps, rps->min_freq);
> +		min_dt = ktime_sub(ktime_get(), min_dt);
> +
> +		igt_spinner_end(&spin);
> +
> +		pr_info("%s: range:[%x:%uMHz, %x:%uMHz] actual:[ %x:%uMHz, %x:%uMHz], %x:%x response %lluns:%lluns\n",
> +			engine->name,
> +			rps->min_freq, intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->min_freq),
> +			rps->max_freq, intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->max_freq),
> +			act, intel_gpu_freq(rps, act),
> +			limit, intel_gpu_freq(rps, limit),
> +			min, max, ktime_to_ns(min_dt), ktime_to_ns(max_dt));
> +
> +		if (limit == rps->min_freq) {
> +			pr_err("%s: GPU throttled to minimum!\n",
> +			       engine->name);
> +			err = -ENODEV;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (igt_flush_test(gt->i915)) {
> +			err = -EIO;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	intel_gt_pm_put(gt);
> +
> +	igt_spinner_fini(&spin);
> +
> +	intel_gt_pm_wait_for_idle(gt);
> +	rps->work.func = saved_work;
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
>  static u64 __measure_frequency(u32 *cntr, int duration_ms)
>  {
>  	u64 dc, dt;
> @@ -125,16 +291,10 @@ static u64 measure_frequency_at(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 *cntr, int *freq)
>  	u64 x[5];
>  	int i;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
> -	GEM_BUG_ON(!rps->active);
> -	intel_rps_set(rps, *freq);
> -	mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
> -
> -	msleep(20); /* more than enough time to stabilise! */
> -
> +	*freq = rps_set_check(rps, *freq);
>  	for (i = 0; i < 5; i++)
>  		x[i] = __measure_frequency(cntr, 2);
> -	*freq = read_cagf(rps);
> +	*freq = (*freq + read_cagf(rps)) / 2;
>  
>  	/* A simple triangle filter for better result stability */
>  	sort(x, 5, sizeof(*x), cmp_u64, NULL);
> @@ -279,10 +439,7 @@ static int __rps_up_interrupt(struct intel_rps *rps,
>  	if (!intel_engine_can_store_dword(engine))
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
> -	GEM_BUG_ON(!rps->active);
> -	intel_rps_set(rps, rps->min_freq);
> -	mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
> +	rps_set_check(rps, rps->min_freq);
>  
>  	rq = igt_spinner_create_request(spin, engine->kernel_context, MI_NOOP);
>  	if (IS_ERR(rq))
> @@ -354,10 +511,7 @@ static int __rps_down_interrupt(struct intel_rps *rps,
>  	struct intel_uncore *uncore = engine->uncore;
>  	u32 timeout;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
> -	GEM_BUG_ON(!rps->active);
> -	intel_rps_set(rps, rps->max_freq);
> -	mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
> +	rps_set_check(rps, rps->max_freq);
>  
>  	if (!(rps->pm_events & GEN6_PM_RP_DOWN_THRESHOLD)) {
>  		pr_err("%s: RPS did not register DOWN interrupt\n",
> @@ -490,16 +644,10 @@ static u64 measure_power_at(struct intel_rps *rps, int *freq)
>  	u64 x[5];
>  	int i;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
> -	GEM_BUG_ON(!rps->active);
> -	intel_rps_set(rps, *freq);
> -	mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
> -
> -	msleep(20); /* more than enough time to stabilise! */
> -
> +	*freq = rps_set_check(rps, *freq);
>  	for (i = 0; i < 5; i++)
>  		x[i] = __measure_power(5);
> -	*freq = read_cagf(rps);
> +	*freq = (*freq + read_cagf(rps)) / 2;
>  
>  	/* A simple triangle filter for better result stability */
>  	sort(x, 5, sizeof(*x), cmp_u64, NULL);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.h
> index 07c2bddf8899..be0bf8e3f639 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>  #ifndef SELFTEST_RPS_H
>  #define SELFTEST_RPS_H
>  
> +int live_rps_control(void *arg);
>  int live_rps_frequency(void *arg);
>  int live_rps_interrupt(void *arg);
>  int live_rps_power(void *arg);
> -- 
> 2.20.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux