The PPS is supposed to reflect the DSC config instead of hard coding the rc_model_size. Make it so. Currently all users of drm_dsc_pps_payload_pack() hard code the size to 8192 also in the DSC config, so this change should have no impact, other than allowing the drivers to use other sizes as needed. Cc: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Harry Wentland <hwentlan@xxxxxxx> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dsc.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dsc.c index 4a475d9696ff..09afbc01ea94 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dsc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dsc.c @@ -186,8 +186,7 @@ void drm_dsc_pps_payload_pack(struct drm_dsc_picture_parameter_set *pps_payload, pps_payload->flatness_max_qp = dsc_cfg->flatness_max_qp; /* PPS 38, 39 */ - pps_payload->rc_model_size = - cpu_to_be16(DSC_RC_MODEL_SIZE_CONST); + pps_payload->rc_model_size = cpu_to_be16(dsc_cfg->rc_model_size); /* PPS 40 */ pps_payload->rc_edge_factor = DSC_RC_EDGE_FACTOR_CONST; -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
