Re: [PATCH v22 01/13] drm/i915: Start passing latency as parameter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 06:47:18PM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> We need to start passing memory latency as a
> parameter when calculating plane wm levels,
> as latency can get changed in different
> circumstances(for example with or without SAGV).
> So we need to be more flexible on that matter.
> 
> v2: Changed latency type from u32 to unsigned int(Ville Syrjälä)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@xxxxxxxxx>

Pushed this one. Thanks.

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 12 ++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 8375054ba27d..b632b6bb9c3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -4016,6 +4016,7 @@ static int skl_compute_wm_params(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  				 int color_plane);
>  static void skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  				 int level,
> +				 unsigned int latency,
>  				 const struct skl_wm_params *wp,
>  				 const struct skl_wm_level *result_prev,
>  				 struct skl_wm_level *result /* out */);
> @@ -4038,7 +4039,9 @@ skl_cursor_allocation(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  	drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, ret);
>  
>  	for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
> -		skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, level, &wp, &wm, &wm);
> +		unsigned int latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[level];
> +
> +		skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, level, latency, &wp, &wm, &wm);
>  		if (wm.min_ddb_alloc == U16_MAX)
>  			break;
>  
> @@ -4972,12 +4975,12 @@ static bool skl_wm_has_lines(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int level)
>  
>  static void skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  				 int level,
> +				 unsigned int latency,
>  				 const struct skl_wm_params *wp,
>  				 const struct skl_wm_level *result_prev,
>  				 struct skl_wm_level *result /* out */)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
> -	u32 latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[level];
>  	uint_fixed_16_16_t method1, method2;
>  	uint_fixed_16_16_t selected_result;
>  	u32 res_blocks, res_lines, min_ddb_alloc = 0;
> @@ -5106,9 +5109,10 @@ skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  
>  	for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
>  		struct skl_wm_level *result = &levels[level];
> +		unsigned int latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[level];
>  
> -		skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, level, wm_params,
> -				     result_prev, result);
> +		skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, level, latency,
> +				     wm_params, result_prev, result);
>  
>  		result_prev = result;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux