Re: [PATCH v4 6/9] drm/i915/tc/tgl: Implement TC cold sequences

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 09:45:12AM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> TC ports can enter in TCCOLD to save power and is required to request
> to PCODE to exit this state before use or read to TC registers.
> 
> For TGL there is a new MBOX command to do that with a parameter to ask
> PCODE to exit and block TCCOLD entry or unblock TCCOLD entry.
> 
> So adding a new power domain to reuse the refcount and only allow
> TC cold when all TC ports are not in use.
> 
> v2:
> - fixed missing case in intel_display_power_domain_str()
> - moved tgl_tc_cold_request to intel_display_power.c
> - renamed TGL_TC_COLD_OFF to TGL_TC_COLD_OFF_POWER_DOMAINS
> - added all TC and TBT aux power domains to
> TGL_TC_COLD_OFF_POWER_DOMAINS
> 
> v3:
> - added one msec sleep when PCODE returns -EAGAIN
> - added timeout of 5msec to not loop forever if
> sandybridge_pcode_write_timeout() keeps returning -EAGAIN
> 
> v4:
> - Made failure to block or unblock TC cold a error
> - removed 5msec timeout, intead giving PCODE 1msec by up 3 times to
> recover from the internal error
> 
> BSpec: 49294
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c    | 107 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h    |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c       |  17 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h               |   4 +
>  4 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> index 50bed2d1dd13..00de926aaccf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> @@ -151,6 +151,8 @@ intel_display_power_domain_str(enum intel_display_power_domain domain)
>  		return "GT_IRQ";
>  	case POWER_DOMAIN_DPLL_DC_OFF:
>  		return "DPLL_DC_OFF";
> +	case POWER_DOMAIN_TC_COLD_OFF:
> +		return "TC_COLD_OFF";
>  	default:
>  		MISSING_CASE(domain);
>  		return "?";
> @@ -2861,6 +2863,21 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  #define TGL_AUX_I_TBT6_IO_POWER_DOMAINS (	\
>  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_I_TBT))
>  
> +#define TGL_TC_COLD_OFF_POWER_DOMAINS (		\
> +	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_D)	|	\
> +	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_E)	|	\
> +	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_F)	|	\
> +	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_G)	|	\
> +	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_H)	|	\
> +	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_I)	|	\
> +	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_D_TBT)	|	\
> +	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_E_TBT)	|	\
> +	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_F_TBT)	|	\
> +	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_G_TBT)	|	\
> +	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_H_TBT)	|	\
> +	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_I_TBT)	|	\
> +	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_TC_COLD_OFF))
> +
>  static const struct i915_power_well_ops i9xx_always_on_power_well_ops = {
>  	.sync_hw = i9xx_power_well_sync_hw_noop,
>  	.enable = i9xx_always_on_power_well_noop,
> @@ -3963,6 +3980,90 @@ static const struct i915_power_well_desc ehl_power_wells[] = {
>  	},
>  };
>  
> +static void
> +tgl_tc_cold_request(struct drm_i915_private *i915, bool block)
> +{
> +	u8 tries = 0;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	while (1) {
> +		u32 low_val = 0, high_val;
> +
> +		if (block)
> +			high_val = TGL_PCODE_EXIT_TCCOLD_DATA_H_BLOCK_REQ;
> +		else
> +			high_val = TGL_PCODE_EXIT_TCCOLD_DATA_H_UNBLOCK_REQ;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Spec states that we should timeout the request after 200us
> +		 * but the function below will timeout after 500us
> +		 */
> +		ret = sandybridge_pcode_read(i915, TGL_PCODE_TCCOLD, &low_val,
> +					     &high_val);
> +		if (ret == 0) {
> +			if (block &&
> +			    (low_val & TGL_PCODE_EXIT_TCCOLD_DATA_L_EXIT_FAILED))
> +				ret = -EIO;
> +			else
> +				break;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (++tries == 3)
> +			break;
> +
> +		msleep(1);

Why did this go back to msleep unconditionally? Doing that only for
ret == -EAGAIN made sense to me, since that is only the case where you'd
want to avoid busy looping.

> +	}
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		drm_err(&i915->drm, "TC cold %sblock failed\n",
> +			block ? "" : "un");
> +	else
> +		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "TC cold %sblock succeeded\n",
> +			    block ? "" : "un");
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +tgl_tc_cold_off_power_well_enable(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> +				  struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> +{
> +	tgl_tc_cold_request(i915, true);
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +tgl_tc_cold_off_power_well_disable(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> +				   struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> +{
> +	tgl_tc_cold_request(i915, false);
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +tgl_tc_cold_off_power_well_sync_hw(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> +				   struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> +{
> +	if (power_well->count > 0)
> +		tgl_tc_cold_off_power_well_enable(i915, power_well);
> +	else
> +		tgl_tc_cold_off_power_well_disable(i915, power_well);
> +}
> +
> +static bool
> +tgl_tc_cold_off_power_well_is_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +				      struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Not the correctly implementation but there is no way to just read it
> +	 * from PCODE, so returning count to avoid state mismatch errors
> +	 */
> +	return power_well->count;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct i915_power_well_ops tgl_tc_cold_off_ops = {
> +	.sync_hw = tgl_tc_cold_off_power_well_sync_hw,
> +	.enable = tgl_tc_cold_off_power_well_enable,
> +	.disable = tgl_tc_cold_off_power_well_disable,
> +	.is_enabled = tgl_tc_cold_off_power_well_is_enabled,
> +};
> +
>  static const struct i915_power_well_desc tgl_power_wells[] = {
>  	{
>  		.name = "always-on",
> @@ -4290,6 +4391,12 @@ static const struct i915_power_well_desc tgl_power_wells[] = {
>  			.hsw.irq_pipe_mask = BIT(PIPE_D),
>  		},
>  	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "TC cold off",
> +		.domains = TGL_TC_COLD_OFF_POWER_DOMAINS,
> +		.ops = &tgl_tc_cold_off_ops,
> +		.id = DISP_PW_ID_NONE,
> +	},
>  };
>  
>  static int
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
> index da64a5edae7a..070457e7b948 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ enum intel_display_power_domain {
>  	POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET,
>  	POWER_DOMAIN_GT_IRQ,
>  	POWER_DOMAIN_DPLL_DC_OFF,
> +	POWER_DOMAIN_TC_COLD_OFF,
>  	POWER_DOMAIN_INIT,
>  
>  	POWER_DOMAIN_NUM,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> index 0cf33d4d21c3..521a94c63640 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> @@ -53,16 +53,27 @@ tc_port_load_fia_params(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static enum intel_display_power_domain
> +tc_cold_get_power_domain(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
> +
> +	if (INTEL_GEN(i915) == 11)
> +		return intel_legacy_aux_to_power_domain(dig_port->aux_ch);
> +	else
> +		return POWER_DOMAIN_TC_COLD_OFF;
> +}
> +
>  static intel_wakeref_t
>  tc_cold_block(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
>  	enum intel_display_power_domain domain;
>  
> -	if (INTEL_GEN(i915) != 11 || !dig_port->tc_legacy_port)
> +	if (INTEL_GEN(i915) == 11 && !dig_port->tc_legacy_port)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	domain = intel_legacy_aux_to_power_domain(dig_port->aux_ch);
> +	domain = tc_cold_get_power_domain(dig_port);
>  	return intel_display_power_get(i915, domain);
>  }
>  
> @@ -80,7 +91,7 @@ tc_cold_unblock(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port, intel_wakeref_t wakeref)
>  	if (wakeref == 0)
>  		return;
>  
> -	domain = intel_legacy_aux_to_power_domain(dig_port->aux_ch);
> +	domain = tc_cold_get_power_domain(dig_port);
>  	intel_display_power_put_async(i915, domain, wakeref);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index e4667add70b0..39f281fe6d6c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -9111,6 +9111,10 @@ enum {
>  #define   ICL_PCODE_EXIT_TCCOLD			0x12
>  #define   HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ		0x17
>  #define   DISPLAY_IPS_CONTROL			0x19
> +#define   TGL_PCODE_TCCOLD			0x26
> +#define     TGL_PCODE_EXIT_TCCOLD_DATA_L_EXIT_FAILED	REG_BIT(0)
> +#define     TGL_PCODE_EXIT_TCCOLD_DATA_H_BLOCK_REQ	0
> +#define     TGL_PCODE_EXIT_TCCOLD_DATA_H_UNBLOCK_REQ	REG_BIT(0)
>              /* See also IPS_CTL */
>  #define     IPS_PCODE_CONTROL			(1 << 30)
>  #define   HSW_PCODE_DYNAMIC_DUTY_CYCLE_CONTROL	0x1A
> -- 
> 2.26.0
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux