On 07/04/2020 11:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-04-07 11:44:45)
On 03/04/2020 10:12, Chris Wilson wrote:
Fixes: a88b6e4cbafd ("drm/i915: Allow specification of parallel execbuf")
It looks like new uapi on the technical level, even though from a higher
level it is just an application of existing uapi across more modes, so
why fixes and who is the consumer?
Submitting semaphores from userspace for batches under construction
[passed between processes via syncobj/sync-file]. iris has a bug where
it is trying to wait on a future fence to be submitted and cannot --
but we already have the uapi to handle that elsewhere.
I am all for consistent uapi and this looks simple enough to me.
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
