On Thu, 2 Apr 2020, Jani Nikula wrote:
Prefer struct drm_device based logging over struct device based logging.
No functional changes.
Cc: Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c
index 5557dfa83a7b..dc250278bd2c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c
@@ -381,14 +381,14 @@ static int i915_gem_init_stolen(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
mutex_init(&i915->mm.stolen_lock);
if (intel_vgpu_active(i915)) {
- dev_notice(i915->drm.dev,
+ drm_notice(&i915->drm,
"%s, disabling use of stolen memory\n",
"iGVT-g active");
return 0;
}
if (intel_vtd_active() && INTEL_GEN(i915) < 8) {
- dev_notice(i915->drm.dev,
+ drm_notice(&i915->drm,
"%s, disabling use of stolen memory\n",
"DMAR active");
return 0;
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
