On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 08:52:05PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 11:40:01PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > gma500 needs 4 bits (to store a pixel multiplier) in the
> > mode->private_flags, i915 currently has three bits defined.
> > No one else uses this. Reduce the size to u8.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I see no point in this patch.
> I saw your comemnt about pahole. But you could move that patch
> after you nuke private_flags and you end up with the same result.
> This just confuse if one dive into the commit history
I thought I had actual numbers in the pahole patch, which would have
been invalidated by moving this. But looks like I didn't even have those
numers there (must have been in the previous cover letter). So yeah,
I guess I'll just squash this with the removal patch.
>
> Sam
>
> > ---
> > include/drm/drm_modes.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_modes.h b/include/drm/drm_modes.h
> > index 917527eb8067..95c23f86ae0c 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_modes.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_modes.h
> > @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ struct drm_display_mode {
> > * by atomic drivers since they can store any additional data by
> > * subclassing state structures.
> > */
> > - int private_flags;
> > + u8 private_flags;
> >
> > /**
> > * @picture_aspect_ratio:
> > --
> > 2.24.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dri-devel mailing list
> > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
