The test is looking at sysfs/error so dumping the old
debugfs/i915_error_state looks quite silly. The only dilemma is whether
it is worth replacing with a line-by-line dump. I propose we make that a
future problem -- and leave it to whoever has to debug it next time.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
lib/igt_aux.c | 1 -
tests/i915/i915_hangman.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/igt_aux.c b/lib/igt_aux.c
index 1a5648444..ecab5d998 100644
--- a/lib/igt_aux.c
+++ b/lib/igt_aux.c
@@ -484,7 +484,6 @@ hang_detector_process(int fd, pid_t pid, dev_t rdev)
str = udev_device_get_property_value(dev, "ERROR");
if (str && atoi(str) == 1) {
- igt_debugfs_dump(fd, "i915_error_state");
show_kernel_stack(pid);
kill(pid, SIGIO);
}
diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_hangman.c b/tests/i915/i915_hangman.c
index 08b06217e..13cd62087 100644
--- a/tests/i915/i915_hangman.c
+++ b/tests/i915/i915_hangman.c
@@ -140,8 +140,6 @@ static void check_error_state(const char *expected_ring_name,
size_t line_size = 0;
bool found = false;
- igt_debugfs_dump(device, "i915_error_state");
-
igt_assert(getline(&line, &line_size, file) != -1);
igt_require(strcasecmp(line, "No error state collected"));
--
2.26.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
