Den 05.04.2020 15.47, skrev Daniel Vetter: > On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 12:18 PM Noralf Trønnes <noralf@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >> Den 03.04.2020 15.57, skrev Daniel Vetter: >>> Also init the fbdev emulation before we register the device, that way >>> we can rely on the auto-cleanup and simplify the probe error code even >>> more. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Sean Paul <sean@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c | 36 +++++++++++------------------------ >>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c >>> index 1ce2d865c36d..4ba5149fdd57 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c >>> @@ -57,27 +57,20 @@ static struct udl_device *udl_driver_create(struct usb_interface *interface) >>> struct udl_device *udl; >>> int r; >>> >>> - udl = kzalloc(sizeof(*udl), GFP_KERNEL); >>> - if (!udl) >>> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >>> - >>> - r = drm_dev_init(&udl->drm, &driver, &interface->dev); >>> - if (r) { >>> - kfree(udl); >>> - return ERR_PTR(r); >>> - } >>> + udl = devm_drm_dev_alloc(&interface->dev, &driver, >>> + struct udl_device, drm); >>> + if (IS_ERR(udl)) >>> + return udl; >>> >>> udl->udev = udev; >>> udl->drm.dev_private = udl; >>> - drmm_add_final_kfree(&udl->drm, udl); >>> >>> r = udl_init(udl); >>> - if (r) { >>> - drm_dev_put(&udl->drm); >>> + if (r) >>> return ERR_PTR(r); >>> - } >>> >>> usb_set_intfdata(interface, udl); >>> + >>> return udl; >>> } >>> >>> @@ -91,23 +84,17 @@ static int udl_usb_probe(struct usb_interface *interface, >>> if (IS_ERR(udl)) >>> return PTR_ERR(udl); >>> >>> + r = drm_fbdev_generic_setup(&udl->drm, 0); >> >> It doesn't feel right to have a client open the device before the DRM >> device itself is registered. I would prefer to keep it where it is but >> ignore any errors. A failing client shouldn't prevent the driver from >> probing. drm_fbdev_generic_setup() do print errors if it fails. So yeah, >> in hindsight I should have made drm_fbdev_generic_setup() return void. > > Hm, we have all kinds of usage right now, some check for errors, some > dont, some do this before drm_dev_register, some after. If your > recommendation is to not check for errors then I'm happy to implement > that, but we're a bit inconsistent. Maybe we should do a patch that at > least always returns 0 no matter what, plus document that the return > value shouldn't be checked? Yeah, always returning zero and documenting it would be a good start. I counted 41 drivers using generic fbdev now, didn't know it was that much used. Only 11 drivers are hand rolling their own: armada gma500 amd omapdrm nouveau i915 msm tegra exynos radeon rockchip Noralf. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx