Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2020-03-30 17:07:34)
> Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Allow some users the discretion to not immediately return on a normal
> > signal. Hopefully, they will opt to use TASK_KILLABLE instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c | 6 ++++--
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h | 6 +++++-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_active.c | 10 +++++-----
> > 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > index a0d31f7bfb42..7b685032cc1e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > @@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static int flush_lazy_signals(struct i915_active *ref)
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > -int i915_active_wait(struct i915_active *ref)
> > +int __i915_active_wait(struct i915_active *ref, int state)
> > {
> > int err;
>
> minor gripe: s/state/task_state
set_current_state()
signal_pending_state()
All locals refer to it as state :)
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
