On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:02:46 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 06:52:52PM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 17:32:35 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 11:20:19AM -0700, Ashutosh Dixit wrote: > >> > > >> > + /* Possible values for __ret are 0, -EFAULT, -ENOSPC, -EAGAIN, ... */ > >> > >> __ret may never be EAGAIN either (comment^). I don't see EAGAIN in the read > >> path. > > > > It's here: > > > > gen8_append_oa_reports() > > { > > > > /* > > * An invalid tail pointer here means we're still waiting for the poll > > * hrtimer callback to give us a pointer > > */ > > if (tail == INVALID_TAIL_PTR) > > return -EAGAIN; > > } > > Oh, you are right, EAGAIN is returned here. I was looking for it with the > poll period patch series applied and these references are removed in that > series. No, you are right, since that series is likely to be merged first, it is better to remove it from this patch. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx