> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 23 March 2020 20:09
> To: Laxminarayan Bharadiya, Pankaj
> <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Lattannavar, Sameer <sameer.lattannavar@xxxxxxxxx>;
> jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; daniel@xxxxxxxx; intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; daniels@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Joonas Lahtinen
> <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>;
> David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915: Introduce scaling filter related registers
> and bit fields.
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 03:51:01PM +0530, Pankaj Bharadiya wrote:
> > Introduce scaler registers and bit fields needed to configure the
> > scaling filter in prgrammed mode and configure scaling filter
> > coefficients.
> >
> > changes since v1:
> > * None
> > changes since RFC:
> > * Parametrize scaler coeffient macros by 'set' (Ville)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya
> > <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 48
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index 9c53fe918be6..d40f12d2a6b5
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -7205,6 +7205,7 @@ enum {
> > #define PS_PLANE_SEL(plane) (((plane) + 1) << 25)
> > #define PS_FILTER_MASK (3 << 23)
> > #define PS_FILTER_MEDIUM (0 << 23)
> > +#define PS_FILTER_PROGRAMMED (1 << 23)
> > #define PS_FILTER_EDGE_ENHANCE (2 << 23)
> > #define PS_FILTER_BILINEAR (3 << 23)
> > #define PS_VERT3TAP (1 << 21)
> > @@ -7219,6 +7220,10 @@ enum {
> > #define PS_VADAPT_MODE_MOST_ADAPT (3 << 5) #define
> > PS_PLANE_Y_SEL_MASK (7 << 5) #define PS_PLANE_Y_SEL(plane) (((plane)
> > + 1) << 5)
> > +#define PS_Y_VERT_FILTER_SELECT(set) ((set) << 4)
> > +#define PS_Y_HORZ_FILTER_SELECT(set) ((set) << 3)
> > +#define PS_UV_VERT_FILTER_SELECT(set) ((set) << 2) #define
> > +PS_UV_HORZ_FILTER_SELECT(set) ((set) << 1)
> >
> > #define _PS_PWR_GATE_1A 0x68160
> > #define _PS_PWR_GATE_2A 0x68260
> > @@ -7281,6 +7286,25 @@ enum {
> > #define _PS_ECC_STAT_2B 0x68AD0
> > #define _PS_ECC_STAT_1C 0x691D0
> >
> > +#define _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_1A 0x68198
> > +#define _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_2A 0x68298
> > +#define _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_1B 0x68998
> > +#define _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_2B 0x68A98
> > +#define _PS_COEF_SET1_INDEX_1A 0x681A0
> > +#define _PS_COEF_SET1_INDEX_2A 0x682A0
> > +#define _PS_COEF_SET1_INDEX_1B 0x689A0
> > +#define _PS_COEF_SET1_INDEX_2B 0x68AA0
> > +#define PS_COEE_INDEX_AUTO_INC (1 << 10)
> > +
> > +#define _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_1A 0x6819C
> > +#define _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_2A 0x6829C
> > +#define _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_1B 0x6899C
> > +#define _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_2B 0x68A9C
> > +#define _PS_COEF_SET1_DATA_1A 0x681A4
> > +#define _PS_COEF_SET1_DATA_2A 0x682A4
> > +#define _PS_COEF_SET1_DATA_1B 0x689A4
> > +#define _PS_COEF_SET1_DATA_2B 0x68AA4
> > +
> > #define _ID(id, a, b) _PICK_EVEN(id, a, b)
> > #define SKL_PS_CTRL(pipe, id) _MMIO_PIPE(pipe, \
> > _ID(id, _PS_1A_CTRL, _PS_2A_CTRL), \
> > @@ -7310,6 +7334,30 @@ enum {
> > _ID(id, _PS_ECC_STAT_1A, _PS_ECC_STAT_2A), \
> > _ID(id, _PS_ECC_STAT_1B, _PS_ECC_STAT_2B))
> >
> > +#define _SKL_PS_COEF_INDEX_SET0(pipe, id) _ID(pipe, \
> > + _ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_1A,
> _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_2A), \
> > + _ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_1B,
> _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_2B))
> > +
> > +#define _SKL_PS_COEF_INDEX_SET1(pipe, id) _ID(pipe, \
> > + _ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET1_INDEX_1A,
> _PS_COEF_SET1_INDEX_2A), \
> > + _ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET1_INDEX_1B,
> _PS_COEF_SET1_INDEX_2B))
> > +
> > +#define _SKL_PS_COEF_DATA_SET0(pipe, id) _ID(pipe, \
> > + _ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_1A,
> _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_2A), \
> > + _ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_1B,
> _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_2B))
> > +
> > +#define _SKL_PS_COEF_DATA_SET1(pipe, id) _ID(pipe, \
> > + _ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET1_DATA_1A,
> _PS_COEF_SET1_DATA_2A), \
> > + _ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET1_DATA_1B,
> _PS_COEF_SET1_DATA_2B))
> > +
> > +#define SKL_PS_COEF_INDEX_SET(pipe, id, set) \
> > + _MMIO_PIPE(set, _SKL_PS_COEF_INDEX_SET0(pipe, id),
> \
> > + _SKL_PS_COEF_INDEX_SET1(pipe, id))
> > +
> > +#define SKL_PS_COEF_DATA_SET(pipe, id, set) \
> > + _MMIO_PIPE(set, _SKL_PS_COEF_DATA_SET0(pipe, id),
> \
> > + _SKL_PS_COEF_DATA_SET1(pipe, id))
>
> I'd name those CNL_PS_COEF_{DATA,INDEX}(). Or maybe eeven GLK_ since it
> already has this despite not being officially supported.
All other existing scaler macros start will SKL_PS_*, adding new CNL_PS_* may
lead to confusion IMO since we will end up in using mixed SKL_PS_* and CNL_PS_* name
to configure scaler.
>
> Also I'd probably just have used +(set)*8 instead of adding another trip through
> _PICK_EVEN(). It's getting a bit hard to read this.
OK.
How does this sound like? -
+#define SKL_PS_COEF_INDEX_SET(pipe, id, set) _MMIO_PIPE(pipe, \
+ _ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_1A, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_2A) + (set) * 8, \
+ _ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_1B, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_2B) + (set) * 8)
+#define SKL_PS_COEF_DATA_SET(pipe, id, set) _MMIO_PIPE(pipe, \
+ _ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_1A, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_2A) + (set) * 8, \
+ _ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_1B, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_2B) + (set) * 8)
Thanks,
Pankaj
>
> > +
> > /* legacy palette */
> > #define _LGC_PALETTE_A 0x4a000
> > #define _LGC_PALETTE_B 0x4a800
> > --
> > 2.23.0
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
