Re: [PATCH v19 4/8] drm/i915: Refactor intel_can_enable_sagv

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 04:18:36PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 02:51:41PM +0200, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 06:31:30PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 06:12:00PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > > > Currently intel_can_enable_sagv function contains
> > > > a mix of workarounds for different platforms
> > > > some of them are not valid for gens >= 11 already,
> > > > so lets split it into separate functions.
> > > > 
> > > > v2:
> > > >     - Rework watermark calculation algorithm to
> > > >       attempt to calculate Level 0 watermark
> > > >       with added sagv block time latency and
> > > >       check if it fits in DBuf in order to
> > > >       determine if SAGV can be enabled already
> > > >       at this stage, just as BSpec 49325 states.
> > > >       if that fails rollback to usual Level 0
> > > >       latency and disable SAGV.
> > > >     - Remove unneeded tabs(James Ausmus)
> > > > 
> > > > v3: Rebased the patch
> > > > 
> > > > v4: - Added back interlaced check for Gen12 and
> > > >       added separate function for TGL SAGV check
> > > >       (thanks to James Ausmus for spotting)
> > > >     - Removed unneeded gen check
> > > >     - Extracted Gen12 SAGV decision making code
> > > >       to a separate function from skl_compute_wm
> > > > 
> > > > v5: - Added SAGV global state to dev_priv, because
> > > >       we need to track all pipes, not only those
> > > >       in atomic state. Each pipe has now correspondent
> > > >       bit mask reflecting, whether it can tolerate
> > > >       SAGV or not(thanks to Ville Syrjala for suggestions).
> > > >     - Now using active flag instead of enable in crc
> > > >       usage check.
> > > > 
> > > > v6: - Fixed rebase conflicts
> > > > 
> > > > v7: - kms_cursor_legacy seems to get broken because of multiple memcpy
> > > >       calls when copying level 0 water marks for enabled SAGV, to
> > > >       fix this now simply using that field right away, without copying,
> > > >       for that introduced a new wm_level accessor which decides which
> > > >       wm_level to return based on SAGV state.
> > > > 
> > > > v8: - Protect crtc_sagv_mask same way as we do for other global state
> > > >       changes: i.e check if changes are needed, then grab all crtc locks
> > > >       to serialize the changes(Ville Syrjälä)
> > > >     - Add crtc_sagv_mask caching in order to avoid needless recalculations
> > > >       (Matthew Roper)
> > > >     - Put back Gen12 SAGV switch in order to get it enabled in separate
> > > >       patch(Matthew Roper)
> > > >     - Rename *_set_sagv_mask to *_compute_sagv_mask(Matthew Roper)
> > > >     - Check if there are no active pipes in intel_can_enable_sagv
> > > >       instead of platform specific functions(Matthew Roper), same
> > > >       for intel_has_sagv check.
> > > > 
> > > > v9  - Switched to u8 for crtc_sagv_mask(Ville Syrjälä)
> > > >     - crtc_sagv_mask now is pipe_sagv_mask(Ville Syrjälä)
> > > >     - Extracted sagv checking logic from skl/icl/tgl_compute_sagv_mask
> > > >     - Extracted skl_plane_wm_level function and passing latency to
> > > >       separate patches(Ville Syrjälä)
> > > >     - Removed part of unneeded copy-paste from tgl_check_pipe_fits_sagv_wm
> > > >       (Ville Syrjälä)
> > > >     - Now using simple assignment for sagv_wm0 as it contains only
> > > >       pod types and no pointers(Ville Syrjälä)
> > > >     - Fixed intel_can_enable_sagv not to do double duty, now it only
> > > >       check SAGV bits by ANDing those between local and global state.
> > > >       The SAGV masks are now computed after watermarks are available,
> > > >       in order to be able to figure out if ddb ranges are fitting nicely.
> > > >       (Ville Syrjälä)
> > > >     - Now having uv_sagv_wm0 and sagv_wm0, otherwise we have wrong logic
> > > >       when using skl_plane_wm_level accessor, as we had previously for
> > > >       Gen11+ color plane and regular wm levels, so probably both
> > > >       has to be recalculated with additional SAGV block time for Level 0.
> > > > 
> > > > v10: - Starting to use new global state for storing pipe_sagv_mask
> > > > 
> > > > v11: - Fixed rebase conflict with recent drm-tip
> > > >      - Check if we really need to recalculate SAGV mask, otherwise
> > > >        bail out without making any changes.
> > > >      - Use cached SAGV result, instead of recalculating it everytime,
> > > >        if bw_state hasn't changed.
> > > > 
> > > > v12: - Removed WARN from intel_can_enable_sagv, in some of the commits
> > > >        if we don't recalculated watermarks, bw_state is not recalculated,
> > > >        thus leading to SAGV state not recalculated by the commit state,
> > > >        which is still calling intel_can_enable_sagv function. Fix that
> > > >        by just analyzing the current global bw_state object - because
> > > >        we simply have no other objects related to that.
> > > > 
> > > > v13: - Rebased, fixed warnings regarding long lines
> > > >      - Changed function call sites from intel_atomic_bw* to
> > > >        intel_wb_* as was suggested.(Jani Nikula)
> > > >      - Taken ddb_state_changed and bw_state_changed into use.
> > > > 
> > > > v14: - total_affected_planes is no longer needed to check for ddb changes,
> > > >        just as active_pipe_changes.
> > > > 
> > > > v15: - Fixed stupid mistake with uninitialized crtc in
> > > >        skl_compute_sagv_mask.
> > > > 
> > > > v16: - Convert pipe_sagv_mask to pipe_sagv_reject and now using inverted
> > > >        flag to indicate SAGV readiness for the pipe(Ville Syrjälä)
> > > >      - Added return value to intel_compute_sagv_mask which call
> > > >        intel_atomic_serialize_global_state in order to properly
> > > >        propagate EDEADLCK to drm.
> > > >      - Based on the discussion with Ville, removed active_pipe_changes
> > > >        check and also there seems to be no need for checking ddb_state_changes
> > > >        as well. Instead we just iterate through crtcs in state - having
> > > >        crtc in a state already guarantees that it is at least read-locked
> > > >        Having additional flag to check if there actually were some plane
> > > >        wm/ddb changes would be probably added later as an optimization.
> > > >      - We can't get parent atomic state from crtc_state at commit stage
> > > >        (nice drm feature), also propagating state through function call
> > > >        chain seems to be overkill and not possible(cursor legacy updates)
> > > >        Querying for bw_state object from global state is not possible as
> > > >        it might get swapped with other global state.
> > > >        So... just sticked can_sagv boolean into wm crtc state.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h       |  18 +
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c  |  23 +-
> > > >  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h    |   3 +
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c               | 314 ++++++++++++++++--
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h               |   1 +
> > > >  5 files changed, 318 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> > > > index b5f61463922f..4083adf4b432 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> > > > @@ -18,6 +18,24 @@ struct intel_crtc_state;
> > > >  struct intel_bw_state {
> > > >  	struct intel_global_state base;
> > > >  
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * Contains a bit mask, used to determine, whether correspondent
> > > > +	 * pipe allows SAGV or not.
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	u8 pipe_sagv_reject;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * Used to determine if we already had calculated
> > > > +	 * SAGV mask for this state once.
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	bool sagv_calculated;
> > > 
> > > Why would we even attempt to calculate it many times?
> > > 
> > > > +
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * Contains final SAGV decision based on current mask,
> > > > +	 * to prevent doing the same job over and over again.
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	bool can_sagv;
> > > 
> > > This is redundant since it's just sagv_reject==0.
> > > 
> > > > +
> > > >  	unsigned int data_rate[I915_MAX_PIPES];
> > > >  	u8 num_active_planes[I915_MAX_PIPES];
> > > >  };
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > > index 8f23c4d51c33..9e0058a78ea6 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > > @@ -14010,7 +14010,10 @@ static void verify_wm_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > > >  		/* Watermarks */
> > > >  		for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
> > > >  			if (skl_wm_level_equals(&hw_plane_wm->wm[level],
> > > > -						&sw_plane_wm->wm[level]))
> > > > +						&sw_plane_wm->wm[level]) ||
> > > > +			   (skl_wm_level_equals(&hw_plane_wm->wm[level],
> > > > +						&sw_plane_wm->sagv_wm0) &&
> > > > +			   (level == 0)))
> > > 
> > > Pointless parens. Also we should do the check as
> > > 'level == 0 && wm_equals(sagv)' to skip the pointless comparison when
> > > level != 0.
> > > 
> > > I guess we can't read out sagv state due to the silly pcode interface?
> > > 
> > > >  				continue;
> > > >  
> > > >  			drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > > @@ -14065,7 +14068,10 @@ static void verify_wm_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > > >  		/* Watermarks */
> > > >  		for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
> > > >  			if (skl_wm_level_equals(&hw_plane_wm->wm[level],
> > > > -						&sw_plane_wm->wm[level]))
> > > > +						&sw_plane_wm->wm[level]) ||
> > > > +			   (skl_wm_level_equals(&hw_plane_wm->wm[level],
> > > > +						&sw_plane_wm->sagv_wm0) &&
> > > > +			   (level == 0)))
> > > >  				continue;
> > > >  
> > > >  			drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > > @@ -15544,8 +15550,10 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > > >  		 * SKL workaround: bspec recommends we disable the SAGV when we
> > > >  		 * have more then one pipe enabled
> > > >  		 */
> > > > -		if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(state))
> > > > -			intel_disable_sagv(dev_priv);
> > > > +		if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11) {
> > > > +			if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(state))
> > > > +				intel_disable_sagv(dev_priv);
> > > > +		}
> > > >  
> > > >  		intel_modeset_verify_disabled(dev_priv, state);
> > > >  	}
> > > > @@ -15645,8 +15653,10 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > > >  	if (state->modeset)
> > > >  		intel_verify_planes(state);
> > > >  
> > > > -	if (state->modeset && intel_can_enable_sagv(state))
> > > > -		intel_enable_sagv(dev_priv);
> > > > +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11) {
> > > > +		if (state->modeset && intel_can_enable_sagv(state))
> > > > +			intel_enable_sagv(dev_priv);
> > > > +	}
> > > >  
> > > >  	drm_atomic_helper_commit_hw_done(&state->base);
> > > >  
> > > > @@ -15798,7 +15808,6 @@ static int intel_atomic_commit(struct drm_device *dev,
> > > >  
> > > >  	if (state->global_state_changed) {
> > > >  		assert_global_state_locked(dev_priv);
> > > > -
> > > >  		dev_priv->active_pipes = state->active_pipes;
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > > index 5e00e611f077..da0308b87dad 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > > @@ -669,11 +669,14 @@ struct skl_plane_wm {
> > > >  	struct skl_wm_level wm[8];
> > > >  	struct skl_wm_level uv_wm[8];
> > > >  	struct skl_wm_level trans_wm;
> > > > +	struct skl_wm_level sagv_wm0;
> > > > +	struct skl_wm_level uv_sagv_wm0;
> > > >  	bool is_planar;
> > > >  };
> > > >  
> > > >  struct skl_pipe_wm {
> > > >  	struct skl_plane_wm planes[I915_MAX_PLANES];
> > > > +	bool can_sagv;
> > > >  };
> > > >  
> > > >  enum vlv_wm_level {
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > > index c72fa59a8302..f598b55f4abc 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
> > > >  #include "i915_fixed.h"
> > > >  #include "i915_irq.h"
> > > >  #include "i915_trace.h"
> > > > +#include "display/intel_bw.h"
> > > >  #include "intel_pm.h"
> > > >  #include "intel_sideband.h"
> > > >  #include "../../../platform/x86/intel_ips.h"
> > > > @@ -3634,7 +3635,7 @@ static bool skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > > >  	return IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv) || IS_BROXTON(dev_priv);
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > -static bool
> > > > +bool
> > > >  intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	/* HACK! */
> > > > @@ -3757,39 +3758,25 @@ intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > > >  	return 0;
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > -bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > > > +static bool skl_can_enable_sagv_on_pipe(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > > 
> > > This extraction looks to be trivially done as a separate patch.
> > > 
> > > >  {
> > > > -	struct drm_device *dev = state->base.dev;
> > > > +	struct drm_device *dev = crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev;
> > > >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > > > +	struct intel_atomic_state *state = to_intel_atomic_state(crtc_state->uapi.state);
> > > >  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> > > >  	struct intel_plane *plane;
> > > > -	struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> > > > -	enum pipe pipe;
> > > >  	int level, latency;
> > > >  
> > > > -	if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv))
> > > > -		return false;
> > > > -
> > > > -	/*
> > > > -	 * If there are no active CRTCs, no additional checks need be performed
> > > > -	 */
> > > > -	if (hweight8(state->active_pipes) == 0)
> > > > -		return true;
> > > > +	crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> > > >  
> > > > -	/*
> > > > -	 * SKL+ workaround: bspec recommends we disable SAGV when we have
> > > > -	 * more then one pipe enabled
> > > > -	 */
> > > > -	if (hweight8(state->active_pipes) > 1)
> > > > +	if ((INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <= 9) && (hweight8(state->active_pipes) > 1))
> > > >  		return false;
> > > >  
> > > > -	/* Since we're now guaranteed to only have one active CRTC... */
> > > > -	pipe = ffs(state->active_pipes) - 1;
> > > > -	crtc = intel_get_crtc_for_pipe(dev_priv, pipe);
> > > > -	crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->base.state);
> > > > -
> > > > -	if (crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
> > > > +	if (crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE) {
> > > > +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No SAGV for interlaced mode on pipe %c\n",
> > > > +			      pipe_name(crtc->pipe));
> > > >  		return false;
> > > > +	}
> > > >  
> > > >  	for_each_intel_plane_on_crtc(dev, crtc, plane) {
> > > >  		struct skl_plane_wm *wm =
> > > > @@ -3816,13 +3803,145 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > > >  		 * incur memory latencies higher than sagv_block_time_us we
> > > >  		 * can't enable SAGV.
> > > >  		 */
> > > > -		if (latency < dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us)
> > > > +		if (latency < dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us) {
> > > > +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Latency %d < sagv block time %d, no SAGV for pipe %c\n",
> > > > +				      latency, dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us, pipe_name(crtc->pipe));
> > > >  			return false;
> > > > +		}
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > >  	return true;
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > +static bool
> > > > +tgl_can_enable_sagv_on_pipe(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> > > > +
> > > > +static bool intel_calculate_sagv_result(struct intel_bw_state *bw_state)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	return bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject == 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int intel_compute_sagv_mask(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	int ret;
> > > > +	struct drm_device *dev = state->base.dev;
> > > > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > > > +	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> > > > +	struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
> > > > +	struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
> > > > +	struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
> > > > +	int i;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * If SAGV is not supported we just can't do anything
> > > > +	 * not even set or reject SAGV points - just bail out.
> > > > +	 * Thus avoid needless calculations.
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv))
> > > > +		return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > +	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc,
> > > > +					 new_crtc_state, i) {
> > > > +		bool pipe_sagv_enable;
> > > > +
> > > > +		new_bw_state = intel_bw_get_state(state);
> > > > +		old_bw_state = intel_bw_get_old_state(state);
> > > > +
> > > > +		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(new_bw_state) || IS_ERR_OR_NULL(old_bw_state)) {a
> > > > +			WARN(1, "Could not get bw_state\n");
> > > > +			return -EINVAL;
> > > 
> > > What is this?
> > > 
> > > > +		}
> > > > +
> > > > +		new_bw_state->sagv_calculated = false;
> > > > +
> > > > +		if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12)
> > > > +			pipe_sagv_enable = tgl_can_enable_sagv_on_pipe(new_crtc_state);
> > > > +		else
> > > > +			pipe_sagv_enable = skl_can_enable_sagv_on_pipe(new_crtc_state);
> > > > +
> > > > +		if (pipe_sagv_enable)
> > > > +			new_bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject &= ~BIT(crtc->pipe);
> > > > +		else
> > > > +			new_bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject |= BIT(crtc->pipe);
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (!new_bw_state || !old_bw_state)
> > > > +		return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > +	new_bw_state->can_sagv = intel_calculate_sagv_result(new_bw_state);
> > > > +	new_bw_state->sagv_calculated = true;
> > > > +
> > > > +	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc,
> > > > +					 new_crtc_state, i) {
> > > > +		struct skl_pipe_wm *pipe_wm = &new_crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal;
> > > > +
> > > > +		/*
> > > > +		 * Due to drm limitation at commit state, when
> > > > +		 * changes are written the whole atomic state is
> > > > +		 * zeroed away => which prevents from using it,
> > > > +		 * so just sticking it into pipe wm state for
> > > > +		 * keeping it simple - anyway this is related to wm.
> > > > +		 * Proper way in ideal universe would be of course not
> > > > +		 * to lose parent atomic state object from child crtc_state,
> > > > +		 * and stick to OOP programming principles, which had been
> > > > +		 * scientifically proven to work.
> > > > +		 */
> > > > +		pipe_wm->can_sagv = new_bw_state->can_sagv;
> > > 
> > > I would probably name that wm->can_sagv as wm->use_sagv_wm so it's clear
> > > what it does.
> > > 
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * For SAGV we need to account all the pipes,
> > > > +	 * not only the ones which are in state currently.
> > > > +	 * Grab all locks if we detect that we are actually
> > > > +	 * going to do something.
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	if (new_bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject != old_bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject) {
> > > > +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("State %p: old sagv mask 0x%x, new sagv mask 0x%x\n",
> > > > +			      state,
> > > > +			      old_bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject,
> > > > +			      new_bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject);
> > > > +
> > > > +		ret = intel_atomic_serialize_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
> > > > +		if (ret) {
> > > > +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not serialize global state\n");
> > > > +			return ret;
> > > > +		}
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * This function to be used before swap state
> > > > + */
> > > > +bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct drm_device *dev = state->base.dev;
> > > > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > > > +	struct intel_bw_state *bw_state;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv)) {
> > > > +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No SAGV support detected\n");
> > > > +		return false;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	bw_state = intel_bw_get_state(state);
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(bw_state)) {
> > > 
> > > It can't be NULL. And if you get an error you must propagate it upwards.
> > 
> > Can you please elaborate what I should do here?
> > Just want to save some time without wasting time guessing.
> > The options are:
> > 
> > 1) If I propagate an error upwards, I obviously need to change a signature
> >    to int intel_can_enable_sagv, also if I do that usage at legacy callsites
> >    for this function will change, i.e you won't be able to call it like
> >    if (intel_can_enable_sagv()) anymore. Is it that what you want?
> >    Should note also that most of the legacy call sites are from commit_tail
> >    which wouldn't even propagate it further, because as you know it is already
> >    point of no return.
> 
> Looks like intel_can_enable_sagv() should not exist anymore. We should
> just precompute the sagv mask in the bw atomic check, and then the commit
> time checks will simply become checks of the sagv mask.

Was thinking about that, but then the question is how to deal with legacy
stuff - for instance, skl doesn't have QGV points at all, as I understand
some platforms just have it as a switch so we'll have to have somekind
of code like this anyway, i.e just checking if we can and then switch.

Or basically we would be just inlining the intel_can_enable_sagv to
intel_atomic_commit_tail as I understand. Because yep for gen >=11
it just a matter of pre/post updating qgv points, but for skl we 
still need some condition to check when we are calling intel_enable/disable sagv


Stan


> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux