On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 14:42 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> This implements a simple variably low-pass-filtering governor in
> control of the HWP MIN/MAX PERF range based on the previously
> introduced get_vlp_target_range(). See "cpufreq: intel_pstate:
> Implement VLP controller target P-state range estimation." for the
> rationale.
I just gave a try on a pretty idle system with just systemd processes
and usual background tasks with nomodset.
I see that there HWP min is getting changed between 4-8. Why are
changing HWP dynamic range even on an idle system running no where
close to TDP?
Thanks,
Srinivas
>
> Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 79
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index cecadfec8bc1..a01eed40d897 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -1905,6 +1905,20 @@ static void intel_pstate_reset_vlp(struct
> cpudata *cpu)
> vlp->gain = max(1, div_fp(1000, vlp_params.setpoint_0_pml));
> vlp->target.p_base = 0;
> vlp->stats.last_response_frequency_hz = vlp_params.avg_hz;
> +
> + if (hwp_active) {
> + const uint32_t p0 = max(cpu->pstate.min_pstate,
> + cpu->min_perf_ratio);
> + const uint32_t p1 = max_t(uint32_t, p0, cpu-
> >max_perf_ratio);
> + const uint64_t hwp_req = (READ_ONCE(cpu-
> >hwp_req_cached) &
> + ~(HWP_MAX_PERF(~0L) |
> + HWP_MIN_PERF(~0L) |
> + HWP_DESIRED_PERF(~0L))) |
> + HWP_MIN_PERF(p0) |
> HWP_MAX_PERF(p1);
> +
> + wrmsrl_on_cpu(cpu->cpu, MSR_HWP_REQUEST, hwp_req);
> + cpu->hwp_req_cached = hwp_req;
> + }
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -2222,6 +2236,46 @@ static void intel_pstate_adjust_pstate(struct
> cpudata *cpu)
> fp_toint(cpu->iowait_boost * 100));
> }
>
> +static void intel_pstate_adjust_pstate_range(struct cpudata *cpu,
> + const unsigned int
> range[])
> +{
> + const int from = cpu->hwp_req_cached;
> + unsigned int p0, p1, p_min, p_max;
> + struct sample *sample;
> + uint64_t hwp_req;
> +
> + update_turbo_state();
> +
> + p0 = max(cpu->pstate.min_pstate, cpu->min_perf_ratio);
> + p1 = max_t(unsigned int, p0, cpu->max_perf_ratio);
> + p_min = clamp_t(unsigned int, range[0], p0, p1);
> + p_max = clamp_t(unsigned int, range[1], p0, p1);
> +
> + trace_cpu_frequency(p_max * cpu->pstate.scaling, cpu->cpu);
> +
> + hwp_req = (READ_ONCE(cpu->hwp_req_cached) &
> + ~(HWP_MAX_PERF(~0L) | HWP_MIN_PERF(~0L) |
> + HWP_DESIRED_PERF(~0L))) |
> + HWP_MIN_PERF(vlp_params.debug & 2 ? p0 : p_min) |
> + HWP_MAX_PERF(vlp_params.debug & 4 ? p1 : p_max);
> +
> + if (hwp_req != cpu->hwp_req_cached) {
> + wrmsrl(MSR_HWP_REQUEST, hwp_req);
> + cpu->hwp_req_cached = hwp_req;
> + }
> +
> + sample = &cpu->sample;
> + trace_pstate_sample(mul_ext_fp(100, sample->core_avg_perf),
> + fp_toint(sample->busy_scaled),
> + from,
> + hwp_req,
> + sample->mperf,
> + sample->aperf,
> + sample->tsc,
> + get_avg_frequency(cpu),
> + fp_toint(cpu->iowait_boost * 100));
> +}
> +
> static void intel_pstate_update_util(struct update_util_data *data,
> u64 time,
> unsigned int flags)
> {
> @@ -2260,6 +2314,22 @@ static void intel_pstate_update_util(struct
> update_util_data *data, u64 time,
> intel_pstate_adjust_pstate(cpu);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * Implementation of the cpufreq update_util hook based on the VLP
> + * controller (see get_vlp_target_range()).
> + */
> +static void intel_pstate_update_util_hwp_vlp(struct update_util_data
> *data,
> + u64 time, unsigned int
> flags)
> +{
> + struct cpudata *cpu = container_of(data, struct cpudata,
> update_util);
> +
> + if (update_vlp_sample(cpu, time, flags)) {
> + const struct vlp_target_range *target =
> + get_vlp_target_range(cpu);
> + intel_pstate_adjust_pstate_range(cpu, target->value);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static struct pstate_funcs core_funcs = {
> .get_max = core_get_max_pstate,
> .get_max_physical = core_get_max_pstate_physical,
> @@ -2389,6 +2459,9 @@ static int intel_pstate_init_cpu(unsigned int
> cpunum)
>
> intel_pstate_get_cpu_pstates(cpu);
>
> + if (pstate_funcs.update_util ==
> intel_pstate_update_util_hwp_vlp)
> + intel_pstate_reset_vlp(cpu);
> +
> pr_debug("controlling: cpu %d\n", cpunum);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -2398,7 +2471,8 @@ static void
> intel_pstate_set_update_util_hook(unsigned int cpu_num)
> {
> struct cpudata *cpu = all_cpu_data[cpu_num];
>
> - if (hwp_active && !hwp_boost)
> + if (hwp_active && !hwp_boost &&
> + pstate_funcs.update_util !=
> intel_pstate_update_util_hwp_vlp)
> return;
>
> if (cpu->update_util_set)
> @@ -2526,7 +2600,8 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy)
> * was turned off, in that case we need to clear the
> * update util hook.
> */
> - if (!hwp_boost)
> + if (!hwp_boost && pstate_funcs.update_util !=
> + intel_pstate_update_util_hwp_vlp)
> intel_pstate_clear_update_util_hook(policy-
> >cpu);
> intel_pstate_hwp_set(policy->cpu);
> }
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
