On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 01:57:58PM +0000, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote: > >> >> Add correspondent helpers to be able to get old/new bandwidth > >> >> global state object. > >> >> > >> >> v2: - Fixed typo in function call > >> >> v3: - Changed new functions naming to use convention proposed > >> >> by Jani Nikula, i.e intel_bw_* in intel_bw.c file. > >> > >> >Still nak on the rename. > >> > >> Cool. Discuss it with Jani Nikula then, to have at least some common strategy on how to be picky on me. > > >The strategy is either rename all of these functions or none so that we > >don't end up with random inconsistencies all over the place. > > > Initially Jani Nikula wrote that he is trying to encourage people to call functions > > starting with the module name. OK. Done it. > > > You say that the opposite and nack. Now it just turns out that it is again _me_ - poor minded, who didn't understand that I need to rename > > all functions now here as well, including those completely unrelated to that patch. > > Sure - we have "plenty" of time! > > > Or may be I shouldn't rename - kind of confused now. If you do a mass rename do it as a separate series. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
