Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] drm/edid: Name the detailed monitor range flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 02:39:39PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> This patch adds defines for the detailed monitor
> range flags as per the EDID specification.
> 
> v2:
> * Rename the flags with DRM_EDID_ (Jani N)
> 
> Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Clinton A Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kazlauskas Nicholas <Nicholas.Kazlauskas@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/drm/drm_edid.h | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_edid.h b/include/drm/drm_edid.h
> index f0b03d401c27..34b15e3d070c 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_edid.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_edid.h
> @@ -91,6 +91,11 @@ struct detailed_data_string {
>  	u8 str[13];
>  } __attribute__((packed));
>  
> +#define DRM_EDID_DEFAULT_GTF_SUPPORT_FLAG   0x00
> +#define DRM_EDID_RANGE_LIMITS_ONLY_FLAG     0x01
> +#define DRM_EDID_SECONDARY_GTF_SUPPORT_FLAG 0x02
> +#define DRM_EDID_CVT_SUPPORT_FLAG           0x04

No indication what flags thse are. Also missing the
actual change to use them in drm_edid.c.

> +
>  struct detailed_data_monitor_range {
>  	u8 min_vfreq;
>  	u8 max_vfreq;
> -- 
> 2.19.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux