Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/gt: allow setting generic data pointer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 3/6/20 12:06 PM, Andi Shyti wrote:
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxx>

When registering debugfs files the intel gt debugfs library
forces a 'struct *gt' private data on the caller.

There might be different needs, therefore make it generic by
adding one more argument to the "debugfs_register_files()"
function which gets the generic void private data as argument.

Still keep it simple by defining a wrapper where struct *gt is
the chosen private data to be stored.

I take the chance to rename the functions by using "intel_gt_" as
prefix instead of "debugfs_".

Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Changelog:
v2:
  - the eval function is made generic as suggested by Daniele.

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_engines.c |  2 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c      | 11 +++++------
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.h      | 12 +++++++-----
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c   | 14 +++++++++-----
  4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_engines.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_engines.c
index 6a5e9ab20b94..3434df10d58c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_engines.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_engines.c
@@ -32,5 +32,5 @@ void debugfs_engines_register(struct intel_gt *gt, struct dentry *root)
  		{ "engines", &engines_fops },
  	};
- debugfs_gt_register_files(gt, root, files, ARRAY_SIZE(files));
+	intel_gt_debugfs_register_file(gt, root, files, ARRAY_SIZE(files));
  }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c
index 75255aaacaed..24099fb157be 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c
@@ -26,15 +26,14 @@ void debugfs_gt_register(struct intel_gt *gt)
  	debugfs_gt_pm_register(gt, root);
  }
-void debugfs_gt_register_files(struct intel_gt *gt,
-			       struct dentry *root,
-			       const struct debugfs_gt_file *files,
-			       unsigned long count)
+void __intel_gt_debugfs_register_files(struct intel_gt *gt, struct dentry *root,

The gt variable is now unused in this function, so you can get rid of it, which means you can also drop the macro wrapper you have defined below.

+				       const struct debugfs_gt_file *files,
+				       unsigned long count, void *data)
  {
  	while (count--) {
-		if (!files->eval || files->eval(gt))
+		if (!files->eval || files->eval(data))
  			debugfs_create_file(files->name,
-					    0444, root, gt,
+					    0444, root, data,
  					    files->fops);
files++;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.h
index 4ea0f06cda8f..f498fe75c79a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.h
@@ -28,12 +28,14 @@ void debugfs_gt_register(struct intel_gt *gt);
  struct debugfs_gt_file {
  	const char *name;
  	const struct file_operations *fops;
-	bool (*eval)(const struct intel_gt *gt);
+	bool (*eval)(void *data);
  };
-void debugfs_gt_register_files(struct intel_gt *gt,
-			       struct dentry *root,
-			       const struct debugfs_gt_file *files,
-			       unsigned long count);
+void __intel_gt_debugfs_register_files(struct intel_gt *gt, struct dentry *root,
+				       const struct debugfs_gt_file *files,
+				       unsigned long count, void *data);
+
+#define intel_gt_debugfs_register_file(g, r, f, c)	\
+	__intel_gt_debugfs_register_files(g, r, f, c, g)
#endif /* DEBUGFS_GT_H */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c
index 059c9e5c002e..a233b97a9294 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c
@@ -506,9 +506,11 @@ static int llc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
  	return 0;
  }
-static bool llc_eval(const struct intel_gt *gt)
+static bool llc_eval(void *data)
  {
-	return HAS_LLC(gt->i915);
+	struct intel_gt *gt = data;
+
+	return !gt ? false : HAS_LLC(gt->i915);

Is there a case where gt can be NULL?
BTW, you can also have this condition as:

	return gt && HAS_LLC(gt->i915);

Daniele

  }
DEFINE_GT_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(llc);
@@ -580,9 +582,11 @@ static int rps_boost_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
  	return 0;
  }
-static bool rps_eval(const struct intel_gt *gt)
+static bool rps_eval(void *data)
  {
-	return HAS_RPS(gt->i915);
+	struct intel_gt *gt = data;
+
+	return !gt ? false : HAS_RPS(gt->i915);
  }
DEFINE_GT_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(rps_boost);
@@ -597,5 +601,5 @@ void debugfs_gt_pm_register(struct intel_gt *gt, struct dentry *root)
  		{ "rps_boost", &rps_boost_fops, rps_eval },
  	};
- debugfs_gt_register_files(gt, root, files, ARRAY_SIZE(files));
+	intel_gt_debugfs_register_file(gt, root, files, ARRAY_SIZE(files));
  }

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux