Hi Ville,
Can you please rebase on current drm-tip and submit new revision so that
new run can be executed? BAT failure was observed with the last revision
submitted.
On 29-Jan-20 11:50 PM, Ville Syrjala wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
We may want to not use the DSB even if the platform has one.
So replace the HAS_DSB check in the _put() with a cmd_buf check
that will work in either case.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
index 9dd18144a664..12776f09f227 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
@@ -160,9 +160,8 @@ intel_dsb_get(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
void intel_dsb_put(struct intel_dsb *dsb)
{
struct intel_crtc *crtc = container_of(dsb, typeof(*crtc), dsb);
- struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
- if (!HAS_DSB(i915))
+ if (!dsb->cmd_buf)
return;
if (WARN_ON(dsb->refcount == 0))
--
~Swati Sharma
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
