On 2/27/20 5:03 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:35:42PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 04:08:26PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: >>> With CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE, objtool reports: >>> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl()+0x5b7: call to gen8_canonical_addr() with UACCESS enabled >>> >>> This means i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl() is calling gen8_canonical_addr() >>> -- and indirectly, sign_extend64() -- from the user_access_begin/end >>> critical region (i.e, with SMAP disabled). >>> >>> While it's probably harmless in this case, in general we like to avoid >>> extra function calls in SMAP-disabled regions because it can open up >>> inadvertent security holes. >>> >>> Fix it by moving the gen8_canonical_addr() conversion to a separate loop >>> before user_access_begin() is called. >>> >>> Note that gen8_canonical_addr() is now called *before* masking off the >>> PIN_OFFSET_MASK bits. That should be ok because it just does a sign >>> extension and ignores the masked lower bits anyway. >> >> How painful would it be to inline the damn thing? >> <looks> >> static inline u64 gen8_canonical_addr(u64 address) >> { >> return sign_extend64(address, GEN8_HIGH_ADDRESS_BIT); >> } >> static inline __s64 sign_extend64(__u64 value, int index) >> { >> __u8 shift = 63 - index; >> return (__s64)(value << shift) >> shift; >> } >> >> What the hell? Josh, what kind of .config do you have that these are >> _not_ inlined? > > I think this was seen with CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE, which tends to so the commit message correctly says. > ignore inline. > >> And why not mark gen8_canonical_addr() __always_inline? > > Right, marking those two functions as __always_inline is the other > option. The problem is, if you keep doing it, eventually you end up > with __always_inline-itis spreading all over the place. And it affects > all the other callers, at least in the CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE case. > At least this fix is localized. > > But I agree my patch isn't ideal either. fwiw, Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> # build-tested thanks. -- ~Randy _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx