Now that we have struct drm_device based drm_WARN, introduce struct drm_i915_private based i915_MISSING_CASE macro which uses drm_WARN so that device specific information will also get printed in backtrace. i915_MISSING_CASE macro should be preferred over MISSING_CASE, wherever possible. Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h index b0ade76bec90..f8db1eb9c1cc 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h @@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ struct timer_list; #define MISSING_CASE(x) WARN(1, "Missing case (%s == %ld)\n", \ __stringify(x), (long)(x)) +#define i915_MISSING_CASE(i915, x) drm_WARN(&(i915)->drm, 1, \ + "Missing case (%s == %ld)\n", \ + __stringify(x), (long)(x)) + void __printf(3, 4) __i915_printk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, const char *level, const char *fmt, ...); -- 2.23.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
