Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] drm/i915: Remove (pipe == crtc->index) assumption

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:55:27PM +0530, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
> we can't have (pipe == crtc->index) assumption in
> driver in order to support 3 non-contiguous
> display pipe system.
> 
> FIXME: Remove the WARN_ON(drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base) != crtc->pipe)
> when we will fix all such assumption.
> 
> changes since RFC:
> - Added again removed (pipe == crtc->index) WARN_ON.
> - Pass drm_crtc_index instead of intel pipe in order to
>   call drm_handle_vblank().
> 
> v2:
> - used drm_crtc_handle_vblank()/drm_crtc_wait_one_vblank()
>   instead of drm_handle_vblank/drm_wait_one_vblank(). [Jani]
> - introduced intel_handle_vblank() helper to avoid sprinkle
>   of intel_crtc across irq_handlers. [Ville]
> 
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c       |  8 ++++----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 14 +++++++++++++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c                    | 14 +++++++-------
>  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 80eebdc4c670..5333f7a7db42 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -14395,11 +14395,11 @@ verify_single_dpll_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	if (new_crtc_state->hw.active)
>  		I915_STATE_WARN(!(pll->active_mask & crtc_mask),
>  				"pll active mismatch (expected pipe %c in active mask 0x%02x)\n",
> -				pipe_name(drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base)), pll->active_mask);
> +				pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask);
>  	else
>  		I915_STATE_WARN(pll->active_mask & crtc_mask,
>  				"pll active mismatch (didn't expect pipe %c in active mask 0x%02x)\n",
> -				pipe_name(drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base)), pll->active_mask);
> +				pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask);
>  
>  	I915_STATE_WARN(!(pll->state.crtc_mask & crtc_mask),
>  			"pll enabled crtcs mismatch (expected 0x%x in 0x%02x)\n",
> @@ -14428,10 +14428,10 @@ verify_shared_dpll_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>  
>  		I915_STATE_WARN(pll->active_mask & crtc_mask,
>  				"pll active mismatch (didn't expect pipe %c in active mask)\n",
> -				pipe_name(drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base)));
> +				pipe_name(crtc->pipe));
>  		I915_STATE_WARN(pll->state.crtc_mask & crtc_mask,
>  				"pll enabled crtcs mismatch (found %x in enabled mask)\n",
> -				pipe_name(drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base)));
> +				pipe_name(crtc->pipe));
>  	}
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> index 283c622f8ba1..14e3d78fef7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> @@ -1595,11 +1595,23 @@ intel_crtc_has_dp_encoder(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  		 (1 << INTEL_OUTPUT_DP_MST) |
>  		 (1 << INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP));
>  }
> +
>  static inline void
>  intel_wait_for_vblank(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe)
>  {
> -	drm_wait_one_vblank(&dev_priv->drm, pipe);
> +	struct intel_crtc *crtc = intel_get_crtc_for_pipe(dev_priv, pipe);
> +
> +	drm_crtc_wait_one_vblank(&crtc->base);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +intel_handle_vblank(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe)
> +{
> +	struct intel_crtc *crtc = intel_get_crtc_for_pipe(dev_priv, pipe);
> +
> +	drm_crtc_handle_vblank(&crtc->base);
>  }

There's no reason to put that into a header. Just put it into
i915_irq.c. With that

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> +
>  static inline void
>  intel_wait_for_vblank_if_active(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe)
>  {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index a26f2bf1b6ea..bfd3b34f2be3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -1364,7 +1364,7 @@ static void i8xx_pipestat_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  
>  	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
>  		if (pipe_stats[pipe] & PIPE_VBLANK_INTERRUPT_STATUS)
> -			drm_handle_vblank(&dev_priv->drm, pipe);
> +			intel_handle_vblank(dev_priv, pipe);
>  
>  		if (pipe_stats[pipe] & PIPE_CRC_DONE_INTERRUPT_STATUS)
>  			i9xx_pipe_crc_irq_handler(dev_priv, pipe);
> @@ -1382,7 +1382,7 @@ static void i915_pipestat_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  
>  	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
>  		if (pipe_stats[pipe] & PIPE_VBLANK_INTERRUPT_STATUS)
> -			drm_handle_vblank(&dev_priv->drm, pipe);
> +			intel_handle_vblank(dev_priv, pipe);
>  
>  		if (pipe_stats[pipe] & PIPE_LEGACY_BLC_EVENT_STATUS)
>  			blc_event = true;
> @@ -1406,7 +1406,7 @@ static void i965_pipestat_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  
>  	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
>  		if (pipe_stats[pipe] & PIPE_START_VBLANK_INTERRUPT_STATUS)
> -			drm_handle_vblank(&dev_priv->drm, pipe);
> +			intel_handle_vblank(dev_priv, pipe);
>  
>  		if (pipe_stats[pipe] & PIPE_LEGACY_BLC_EVENT_STATUS)
>  			blc_event = true;
> @@ -1432,7 +1432,7 @@ static void valleyview_pipestat_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  
>  	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
>  		if (pipe_stats[pipe] & PIPE_START_VBLANK_INTERRUPT_STATUS)
> -			drm_handle_vblank(&dev_priv->drm, pipe);
> +			intel_handle_vblank(dev_priv, pipe);
>  
>  		if (pipe_stats[pipe] & PIPE_CRC_DONE_INTERRUPT_STATUS)
>  			i9xx_pipe_crc_irq_handler(dev_priv, pipe);
> @@ -1970,7 +1970,7 @@ static void ilk_display_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  
>  	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
>  		if (de_iir & DE_PIPE_VBLANK(pipe))
> -			drm_handle_vblank(&dev_priv->drm, pipe);
> +			intel_handle_vblank(dev_priv, pipe);
>  
>  		if (de_iir & DE_PIPE_FIFO_UNDERRUN(pipe))
>  			intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler(dev_priv, pipe);
> @@ -2023,7 +2023,7 @@ static void ivb_display_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  
>  	for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
>  		if (de_iir & (DE_PIPE_VBLANK_IVB(pipe)))
> -			drm_handle_vblank(&dev_priv->drm, pipe);
> +			intel_handle_vblank(dev_priv, pipe);
>  	}
>  
>  	/* check event from PCH */
> @@ -2336,7 +2336,7 @@ gen8_de_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 master_ctl)
>  		I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IIR(pipe), iir);
>  
>  		if (iir & GEN8_PIPE_VBLANK)
> -			drm_handle_vblank(&dev_priv->drm, pipe);
> +			intel_handle_vblank(dev_priv, pipe);
>  
>  		if (iir & GEN8_PIPE_CDCLK_CRC_DONE)
>  			hsw_pipe_crc_irq_handler(dev_priv, pipe);
> -- 
> 2.24.0

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux