On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 2:50 PM Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:20:57AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > drm_mode_config_cleanup is idempotent, so no harm in calling this > > twice. This allows us to gradually switch drivers over by removing > > explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup calls. > > > > With this step it's not also possible that (at least for simple > > drivers) automatic resource cleanup can be done correctly without a > > drm_driver->release hook. Therefore allow this now in > > devm_drm_dev_init(). > > > > Also with drmm_ explicit drm_driver->release hooks are kinda not the > > best option, so deprecate that hook to discourage future users. > > > > v2: Fixup the example in the kerneldoc too. > > > > Cc: "Noralf Trønnes" <noralf@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 21 +++++---------------- > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c | 12 +++++++++++- > > include/drm/drm_mode_config.h | 2 +- > > 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c > > index 3cf40864d4a6..428c569aaaf1 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c > > @@ -267,8 +267,7 @@ void drm_minor_release(struct drm_minor *minor) > > * > > * The following example shows a typical structure of a DRM display driver. > > * The example focus on the probe() function and the other functions that is > > - * almost always present and serves as a demonstration of devm_drm_dev_init() > > - * usage with its accompanying drm_driver->release callback. > > + * almost always present and serves as a demonstration of devm_drm_dev_init(). > > * > > * .. code-block:: c > > * > > @@ -278,16 +277,8 @@ void drm_minor_release(struct drm_minor *minor) > > * struct clk *pclk; > > * }; > > * > > - * static void driver_drm_release(struct drm_device *drm) > > - * { > > - * struct driver_device *priv = container_of(...); > > - * > > - * drm_mode_config_cleanup(drm); > > - * } > > - * > > * static struct drm_driver driver_drm_driver = { > > * [...] > > - * .release = driver_drm_release, > > * }; > > * > > * static int driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > @@ -312,7 +303,9 @@ void drm_minor_release(struct drm_minor *minor) > > * } > > * drmm_add_final_kfree(drm, priv); > > * > > - * drm_mode_config_init(drm); > > + * ret = drm_mode_config_init(drm); > > + * if (ret) > > + * return ret; > > * > > * priv->userspace_facing = drmm_kzalloc(..., GFP_KERNEL); > > * if (!priv->userspace_facing) > > @@ -710,8 +703,7 @@ static void devm_drm_dev_init_release(void *data) > > * @driver: DRM driver > > * > > * Managed drm_dev_init(). The DRM device initialized with this function is > > - * automatically put on driver detach using drm_dev_put(). You must supply a > > - * &drm_driver.release callback to control the finalization explicitly. > > + * automatically put on driver detach using drm_dev_put(). > > * > > * RETURNS: > > * 0 on success, or error code on failure. > > @@ -722,9 +714,6 @@ int devm_drm_dev_init(struct device *parent, > > { > > int ret; > > > > - if (WARN_ON(!driver->release)) > > - return -EINVAL; > > - > > ret = drm_dev_init(dev, driver, parent); > > if (ret) > > return ret; > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c > > index 08e6eff6a179..957db1edba0c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c > > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ > > #include <drm/drm_drv.h> > > #include <drm/drm_encoder.h> > > #include <drm/drm_file.h> > > +#include <drm/drm_managed.h> > > #include <drm/drm_mode_config.h> > > #include <drm/drm_print.h> > > #include <linux/dma-resv.h> > > @@ -373,6 +374,11 @@ static int drm_mode_create_standard_properties(struct drm_device *dev) > > return 0; > > } > > > > +static void drm_mode_config_init_release(struct drm_device *dev, void *ptr) > > +{ > > + drm_mode_config_cleanup(dev); > > +} > > + > > /** > > * drm_mode_config_init - initialize DRM mode_configuration structure > > * @dev: DRM device > > @@ -384,8 +390,10 @@ static int drm_mode_create_standard_properties(struct drm_device *dev) > > * problem, since this should happen single threaded at init time. It is the > > * driver's problem to ensure this guarantee. > > * > > + * Cleanup is automatically handled through registering drm_mode_config_cleanup > > + * with drmm_add_action(). > > */ > > -void drm_mode_config_init(struct drm_device *dev) > > +int drm_mode_config_init(struct drm_device *dev) > > { > > mutex_init(&dev->mode_config.mutex); > > drm_modeset_lock_init(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex); > > @@ -443,6 +451,8 @@ void drm_mode_config_init(struct drm_device *dev) > > drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&modeset_ctx); > > dma_resv_fini(&resv); > > } > > + > > + return drmm_add_action(dev, drm_mode_config_init_release, NULL); > > If this fails, shouldn't drm_mode_config_cleanup() be called here ? Maybe for ocd reasons, but not for actually cleaning up anything. It's just a bunch of empty lists that drm_mode_config_cleanup will walk and do nothing about. Not sure I should add that ... -Daniel > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_config_init); > > > > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_mode_config.h b/include/drm/drm_mode_config.h > > index 3bcbe30339f0..160a3e4b51c3 100644 > > --- a/include/drm/drm_mode_config.h > > +++ b/include/drm/drm_mode_config.h > > @@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ struct drm_mode_config { > > const struct drm_mode_config_helper_funcs *helper_private; > > }; > > > > -void drm_mode_config_init(struct drm_device *dev); > > +int drm_mode_config_init(struct drm_device *dev); > > void drm_mode_config_reset(struct drm_device *dev); > > void drm_mode_config_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev); > > > > -- > Regards, > > Laurent Pinchart -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx