Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 18 Feb 2020, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Quoting Jani Nikula (2020-02-17 18:42:19)
>>> spinlock_t is one case where the typedef is to be preferred over struct
>>> spinlock.
>>> 
>>> Fixes: 42fb60de3129 ("drm/i915/gem: Don't leak non-persistent requests on changing engines")
>>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> If you say so,
>
> Checkpatch and a git grep popularity contest in the kernel tree say
> so...
>
>> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks!

And pushed.

BR,
Jani.


>
>> If you look you might find a few more I've added ;)
>
> Oh? My git grep fails me then.
>
> BR,
> Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux