Recording the frequent inspection of CSB head/tail when there is
expected to be no update adds noise to the debug trace. (Not entirely
useless, but since we know the sequence of function calls, we can
surmise the function was called -- so redundant.)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index 21385070ad15..230470c58ec9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -2248,7 +2248,6 @@ static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
*/
head = execlists->csb_head;
tail = READ_ONCE(*execlists->csb_write);
- ENGINE_TRACE(engine, "cs-irq head=%d, tail=%d\n", head, tail);
if (unlikely(head == tail))
return;
@@ -2262,6 +2261,7 @@ static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
*/
rmb();
+ ENGINE_TRACE(engine, "cs-irq head=%d, tail=%d\n", head, tail);
do {
bool promote;
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
