On Mon, 03 Feb 2020 10:58:08 +0100, Chris Wilson
<chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2020-02-03 09:54:13)
void intel_guc_ct_init_early(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
{
+ int i;
+
spin_lock_init(&ct->requests.lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ct->requests.pending);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ct->requests.incoming);
INIT_WORK(&ct->requests.worker,
ct_incoming_request_worker_func);
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ct->ctbs); i++) {
+ spin_lock_init(&ct->ctbs[i].lock);
+
lockdep_set_subclass_and_mark_as_used(&ct->ctbs[i].lock, i);
Trybot warned of another issue...
Hmm, trybot mislead me by reporting only one other false-positive
and I failed to check 'details' on my own, thanks for help!
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
