On 30/01/2020 20:47, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-01-30 20:41:24)
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Converts all per-engine tests into dynamic subtests and in the process:
* Put back I915_EXEC_BSD legacy coverage.
* Remove one added static engine list usage.
* Compact code by driving two groups of the name/func table.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Bommu Krishnaiah <krishnaiah.bommu@xxxxxxxxx>
---
tests/i915/gem_ctx_persistence.c | 97 +++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_persistence.c b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_persistence.c
index 8b9633b214ff..0d5b22d2b162 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_persistence.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_persistence.c
@@ -759,7 +759,20 @@ static void smoketest(int i915)
igt_main
{
- const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e;
+ struct {
+ const char *name;
+ void (*func)(int fd, unsigned int engine);
+ } *test, tests[] = {
+ { "persistence", test_persistence },
+ { "cleanup", test_nonpersistent_cleanup },
+ { "queued", test_nonpersistent_queued },
+ { "mixed", test_nonpersistent_mixed },
+ { "mixed-process", test_process_mixed },
+ { "hostile", test_nonpersistent_hostile },
+ { "hostile-preempt", test_nonpersistent_hostile_preempt },
+ { "hang", test_nonpersistent_hang },
+ { NULL, NULL },
Heh, that's what I was tempted to suggest but did want to seem like I
was requesting too much :)
Yeah, much less typing, especially with dynamic subtests.
+ };
int i915;
igt_fixture {
@@ -792,72 +805,40 @@ igt_main
igt_subtest("hang")
test_nohangcheck_hang(i915);
- __for_each_static_engine(e) {
- igt_subtest_group {
- igt_fixture {
- gem_require_ring(i915, e->flags);
- gem_require_contexts(i915);
- }
-
- igt_subtest_f("legacy-%s-persistence", e->name)
- test_persistence(i915, e->flags);
-
- igt_subtest_f("legacy-%s-cleanup", e->name)
- test_nonpersistent_cleanup(i915, e->flags);
-
- igt_subtest_f("legacy-%s-queued", e->name)
- test_nonpersistent_queued(i915, e->flags);
-
- igt_subtest_f("legacy-%s-mixed", e->name)
- test_nonpersistent_mixed(i915, e->flags);
-
- igt_subtest_f("legacy-%s-mixed-process", e->name)
- test_process_mixed(i915, e->flags);
-
- igt_subtest_f("legacy-%s-hostile", e->name)
- test_nonpersistent_hostile(i915, e->flags);
+ igt_subtest("smoketest")
+ smoketest(i915);
- igt_subtest_f("legacy-%s-hostile-preempt", e->name)
- test_nonpersistent_hostile_preempt(i915,
- e->flags);
+ igt_subtest_group {
+ igt_fixture
+ gem_require_contexts(i915);
+
+ for (test = tests; test->name; test++) {
+ igt_subtest_with_dynamic_f("legacy-engines-%s",
+ test->name) {
+ for_each_engine(e, i915) {
Don't we need a
if (!gem_has_ring(i915, eb_ring(e)) continue;
here?
It's built in to for_each_engine, yay for dynamic subtests! :)
+ igt_dynamic_f("%s", e->name)
+ test->func(i915, eb_ring(e));
+ }
+ }
}
}
- __for_each_physical_engine(i915, e) {
- igt_subtest_group {
- igt_fixture
- gem_require_contexts(i915);
-
- igt_subtest_f("%s-persistence", e->name)
- test_persistence(i915, e->flags);
-
- igt_subtest_f("%s-cleanup", e->name)
- test_nonpersistent_cleanup(i915, e->flags);
-
- igt_subtest_f("%s-queued", e->name)
- test_nonpersistent_queued(i915, e->flags);
-
- igt_subtest_f("%s-mixed", e->name)
- test_nonpersistent_mixed(i915, e->flags);
-
- igt_subtest_f("%s-mixed-process", e->name)
- test_process_mixed(i915, e->flags);
+ igt_subtest_group {
+ const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e;
- igt_subtest_f("%s-hostile", e->name)
- test_nonpersistent_hostile(i915, e->flags);
+ igt_fixture
+ gem_require_contexts(i915);
- igt_subtest_f("%s-hostile-preempt", e->name)
- test_nonpersistent_hostile_preempt(i915,
- e->flags);
-
- igt_subtest_f("%s-hang", e->name)
- test_nonpersistent_hang(i915, e->flags);
+ for (test = tests; test->name; test++) {
+ igt_subtest_with_dynamic_f("engines-%s", test->name) {
+ __for_each_physical_engine(i915, e) {
+ igt_dynamic_f("%s", e->name)
+ test->func(i915, e->flags);
+ }
+ }
}
Then I had a plan to add the pathological engines[] here.
Will see later what you exactly mean.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx