On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 04:17:58PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 10:02:24PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > CEA-861 says : > > "d = offset for the byte following the reserved data block. > > If no data is provided in the reserved data block, then d=4. > > If no DTDs are provided, then d=0." > > > > So let's not look for DTDs when d==0. In fact let's just make that > > <4 since those values would just mean that he DTDs overlap the block > > header. And let's also check that d isn't so big as to declare > > the descriptors to live past the block end, although the code > > does already survive that case as we'd just end up with a negative > > number of descriptors and the loop would not do anything. > > > > Cc: Allen Chen <allen.chen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Hm I think edid parsing is like the perfect use-case for some in-kernel > unit tests ... In case anyone feels motivated? Another idea I've been putting off is simply shoving the parser into userspace. Kinda looks like with fork_usermode_blob() we could embed the executable into the kernel/module and thus avoid the problem of actually shipping the binary somehow. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
