On 28/01/2020 15:16, Chris Wilson wrote:
Don't confuse the poor developer by writing a negative value as a very
large positive, as the flow of requests is already complex enough.
Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
index 162c76a9d1e8..bc854ad60954 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
@@ -800,7 +800,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_request_in,
__field(u16, instance)
__field(u32, seqno)
__field(u32, port)
- __field(u32, prio)
+ __field(s32, prio)
),
TP_fast_assign(
@@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_request_in,
__entry->port = port;
),
- TP_printk("dev=%u, engine=%u:%u, ctx=%llu, seqno=%u, prio=%u, port=%u",
+ TP_printk("dev=%u, engine=%u:%u, ctx=%llu, seqno=%u, prio=%d, port=%u",
__entry->dev, __entry->class, __entry->instance,
__entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
__entry->prio, __entry->port)
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
