Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/gem: initial conversion to new logging macros using coccinelle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 28 Jan 2020, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> -DRM_DEBUG(
>> +drm_dbg(&T->drm,
>
> This changes DRM_UT_CORE to DRM_UT_DRIVER so our typical drm.debug=0xe 
> becomes much more spammy.

This is what I've instructed Wambui to do in i915. It's my mistake that
I haven't requested this to be pointed out in the commit message.

DRM_DEBUG() and DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER() have been conflated over the
years. The former is supposed to be for drm core code only, but drivers
are littered with it. I'm hoping drivers are less likely to use the new
drm_dbg_core() which maps to DRM_DEBUG(). The shorter drm_dbg() is the
new DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER().

If you think drm.debug=0xe is too spammy now, the fix is not to abuse
DRM_UT_CORE as a spare category.


BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux