On Tue, 21 Jan 2020, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > ns2501 has a builtin scaler so it doesn't need a fixed mode, but > let's still mark it as LVDS instead of TMDS/DVI to make life less > confusing. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo.c | 13 ++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo.c > index 86a337c9d85d..0d4719daec8e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo.c > @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ > #define INTEL_DVO_CHIP_LVDS 1 > #define INTEL_DVO_CHIP_TMDS 2 > #define INTEL_DVO_CHIP_TVOUT 4 > +#define INTEL_DVO_CHIP_LVDS_NO_FIXED 5 > > #define SIL164_ADDR 0x38 > #define CH7xxx_ADDR 0x76 > @@ -101,13 +102,13 @@ static const struct intel_dvo_device intel_dvo_devices[] = { > .dev_ops = &ch7017_ops, > }, > { > - .type = INTEL_DVO_CHIP_TMDS, > + .type = INTEL_DVO_CHIP_LVDS_NO_FIXED, > .name = "ns2501", > .dvo_reg = DVOB, > .dvo_srcdim_reg = DVOB_SRCDIM, > .slave_addr = NS2501_ADDR, > .dev_ops = &ns2501_ops, > - } > + }, > }; > > struct intel_dvo { > @@ -507,17 +508,19 @@ void intel_dvo_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > intel_encoder->port = port; > intel_encoder->pipe_mask = ~0; > > - switch (dvo->type) { > - case INTEL_DVO_CHIP_TMDS: > + if (dvo->type != INTEL_DVO_CHIP_LVDS) > intel_encoder->cloneable = (1 << INTEL_OUTPUT_ANALOG) | > (1 << INTEL_OUTPUT_DVO); > + > + switch (dvo->type) { > + case INTEL_DVO_CHIP_TMDS: > drm_connector_init(&dev_priv->drm, connector, > &intel_dvo_connector_funcs, > DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DVII); > encoder_type = DRM_MODE_ENCODER_TMDS; > break; > + case INTEL_DVO_CHIP_LVDS_NO_FIXED: > case INTEL_DVO_CHIP_LVDS: > - intel_encoder->cloneable = 0; > drm_connector_init(&dev_priv->drm, connector, > &intel_dvo_connector_funcs, > DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_LVDS); Not sure if the consecutive if and switch here make this part less confusing, but perhaps the higher level semantic change is more important? *shrug* Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx