We have two trace messages that rely on the function name for
distinction. However, if gcc inlines the function, the two traces end up
with the same function name and are indistinguishable. Add a different
message to each to clarify which one we hit, i.e. which phase of engine
parking we are processing.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
index ea90ab3e396e..b6cf284e3a2d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ __queue_and_release_pm(struct i915_request *rq,
{
struct intel_gt_timelines *timelines = &engine->gt->timelines;
- ENGINE_TRACE(engine, "\n");
+ ENGINE_TRACE(engine, "parking\n");
/*
* We have to serialise all potential retirement paths with our
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static int __engine_park(struct intel_wakeref *wf)
if (!switch_to_kernel_context(engine))
return -EBUSY;
- ENGINE_TRACE(engine, "\n");
+ ENGINE_TRACE(engine, "parked\n");
call_idle_barriers(engine); /* cleanup after wedging */
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
