Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Mark the removal of the i915_request from the sched.link

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 20/01/2020 17:57, Chris Wilson wrote:
Keep the rq->fence.flags consistent with the status of the
rq->sched.link, and clear the associated bits when decoupling the link
on retirement (as we may wish to inspect those flags independent of
other state).

Fixes: 32ff621fd744 ("drm/i915/gt: Allow temporary suspension of inflight requests")
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/997
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 2 ++
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index 9ed0d3bc7249..78a5f5d3c070 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -221,6 +221,8 @@ static void remove_from_engine(struct i915_request *rq)
  		locked = engine;
  	}
  	list_del_init(&rq->sched.link);
+	clear_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags);

This one I think can not be set in retirement. Or there is a path?

[comes back after writing the comment below]

Race between completion to hold puts the request on hold, then request completes just as it is un-held? It needs retire to happen at the right time, driven by ...? Is this it?

+	clear_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_HOLD, &rq->fence.flags);

This one I think indeed can race with completion.

Regards,

Tvrtko

  	spin_unlock_irq(&locked->active.lock);
  }
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux