Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Historically, we've had many problems with missed interrupt/seqno > syndrome and so have focus on testing with gem_sync. However, these > tests rely on the kernel itself reporting the issue which it no longer > does. So why the extra variety may impose different timing of execution > on the HW (and so different interrupt timings which may or may not help > uncover issues), they do not have any variety in driver coverage. Reduce > the variety (halving the associated runtime) as they are no more likely > to spot an issue than multiple runs through BAT. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist > index f697eb0cf..8c574d910 100644 > --- a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist > +++ b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist > @@ -45,9 +45,6 @@ igt@gem_ringfill@basic-default-forked > igt@gem_ringfill@basic-default-fd > igt@gem_sync@basic-all > igt@gem_sync@basic-each > -igt@gem_sync@basic-many-each > -igt@gem_sync@basic-store-all > -igt@gem_sync@basic-store-each > igt@gem_tiled_blits@basic > igt@gem_tiled_fence_blits@basic > igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic > -- > 2.25.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
