Re: [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/bios: check port presence based on child device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 05:28:23PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2020, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 05:12:38PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 04:29:28PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> > Affects only two calls in output setup, and ddi init will check the
> >> > features in more fine grained way.
> >> > 
> >> > This will make future changes easier.
> >> > 
> >> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> > ---
> >> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 4 +---
> >> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >> > 
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> >> > index 4c69253739ec..70fb87e7afb6 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> >> > @@ -2236,9 +2236,7 @@ bool intel_bios_is_port_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port por
> >> >  		const struct ddi_vbt_port_info *port_info =
> >> >  			&dev_priv->vbt.ddi_port_info[port];
> >> >  
> >> > -		return port_info->supports_dp ||
> >> > -		       port_info->supports_dvi ||
> >> > -		       port_info->supports_hdmi;
> >> > +		return port_info->child;
> >> 
> >> Pondering what happens if there's a non-DP/DVI/HDMI port declared in the
> >> VBT... I guess those should not have their dvo port set to anything we
> >> accept?
> >
> > Umm, no. We accept DVO_PORT_CRT as PORT_E.
> 
> My argument is this:
> 
> - Shouldn't intel_bios_is_port_present(PORT_E) return true in that case?

Only on hsw/bdw really.

> 
> - Where does the change make a functional difference in the
>   intel_bios_is_port_present() users anyway? AFAICT all the cases will
>   also check the supports_X flags anyway (or have checked before).

After some trawling I can't see anything that should break from this,
so probably fine. But the commit message should probably elaborate
on this a bit more, just in case there is a regression.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> 
> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
> >
> >> 
> >> >  	}
> >> >  
> >> >  	/* FIXME maybe deal with port A as well? */
> >> > -- 
> >> > 2.20.1
> >> > 
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> >> > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Ville Syrjälä
> >> Intel
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux