On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 10:26 PM Harry Wentland <hwentlan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2020-01-09 4:04 p.m., Mario Kleiner wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 8:49 PM Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 11:47 AM Mario Kleiner
<mario.kleiner.de@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 4:40 PM Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 10:08 AM Mario Kleiner
>> <mario.kleiner.de@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
As Harry mentioned in the other thread, won't this only work if the
display was brought up by the vbios? In the suspend/resume case,
won't we just fall back to 2.7Gbps?
Alex
Adding Harry to cc...
The code is only executed for eDP. On the Intel side, it seems that intel_edp_init_dpcd() gets only called during driver load / modesetting init, so not on resume.
On the AMD DC side, dc_link_detect_helper() has this early no-op return at the beginning:
if ((link->connector_signal == SIGNAL_TYPE_LVDS || link->connector_signal == SIGNAL_TYPE_EDP) && link->local_sink) return true;
So i guess if link->local_sink doesn't get NULL'ed during a suspend/resume cycle, then we never reach the setup code that would overwrite with non vbios settings?
Sounds reasonable to me, given that eDP panels are usually fixed internal panels, nothing that gets hot(un-)plugged?
I can't test, because suspend/resume with the Polaris gpu on the MBP 2017 is totally broken atm., just as vgaswitcheroo can't do its job. Looks like powering down the gpu works, but powering up doesn't. And also modesetting at vgaswitcheroo switch time is no-go, because the DDC/AUX lines apparently can't be switched on that Apple gmux, and handover of that data seems to be not implemented in current vgaswitcheroo. At the moment switching between AMD only or Intel+AMD Prime setup is quite a pita...
I haven't followed the entire discussion on the i915 thread but for the amdgpu dc patch I would prefer a DPCD quirk to override the reported link settings with the correct link rate.
Harry
Ok, as you wish. How do i do that? Is there already some DP related official mechanism, or do i just add some if-statement to
detect_edp_sink_caps() that matches on a new EDID quirk to be defined for that panel in drm_edid etc., and then
if (edit quirk for that panel)
dpcd[DP_MAX_LINK_RATE] = 0xc;
The other question would be if we should do it for this panel on AMD DC at all? I see my original patch more as something to fix other odd (Apple?) panels, than for this specific one. As mentioned above, photometer testing on AMD DC with a Polaris on the MBP 2017 suggests that the deault 2.7 Gbps 8 bit mode + AMD's spatial dithering provides higher quality results for >= 10 bpc framebuffers than actually running the panel at 10 bit without dithering.
As a little side-note, for squeezing out more precision than the 10 bpc framebuffers we officially have in Mesa/OpenGL, my software Psychtoolbox has some special hacks, playing funny tricks with resizing X-Screens, applying bit-twiddling shaders to images and MMIO programming the gpu "behind the back" of the driver, to get the gpu into RGBA16161616 linear scanout mode. That gives up to 12 bpc precision on that panel according to photometer measurements. While AMD's dithering with the panel in 8 bit + 4 bit spatial dithering gives pretty good results, panel at 10 bit + 2 bit spatial dithering has some artifacts. And even at a normal 10 bit framebuffer, the 8 bit panel + 2 bit dithering seems to give better results than 10 bit panel mode.
-mario
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
