Hi Chris, On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 08:58:35AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > In the near future, we will want to start a GPU error capture from a new > context, from inside the softirq region of a forced preemption. To do > so requires us to break up the monolithic error capture to provide new > entry points with finer control; in particular focusing on one > engine/gt, and being able to compose an error state from little pieces > of HW capture. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 6 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c | 3 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.h | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 14 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 1169 ++++++++++-------- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.h | 328 +++-- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c | 6 +- don't we want to have a gt/intel_gt_error.[ch] at some point? Andi _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
