Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > intel_timeline_enter() has been decoupled from intel_timeline_pin() and > both enter/exit & pin/unpin are allowed [read expected] to run > concurrently with one another. The assertion that they had better not is > stale. > > Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/940 Hmm I got page not found for this even tho other issues are shown :O References to the decoupling part? -Mika > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c > index ee5dc4fbdeb9..87716529cd2f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c > @@ -348,7 +348,6 @@ void intel_timeline_enter(struct intel_timeline *tl) > * use atomic to manipulate tl->active_count. > */ > lockdep_assert_held(&tl->mutex); > - GEM_BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&tl->pin_count)); > > if (atomic_add_unless(&tl->active_count, 1, 0)) > return; > -- > 2.25.0.rc1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
