Our usual i915 convention is to assume that future platforms will follow
the same behavior as the latest platform of today. The VDBOX/SFC
capabilities described here don't seem like something that should be
specific to TGL, so let's future-proof by making the test apply to all
gen12+ platforms.
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
index 1acb5db77431..bb709a08bd3c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
@@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@ void intel_device_info_init_mmio(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
* hooked up to an SFC (Scaler & Format Converter) unit.
* In TGL each VDBOX has access to an SFC.
*/
- if (IS_TIGERLAKE(dev_priv) || logical_vdbox++ % 2 == 0)
+ if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12 || logical_vdbox++ % 2 == 0)
RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->vdbox_sfc_access |= BIT(i);
}
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("vdbox enable: %04x, instances: %04lx\n",
--
2.23.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
