On 12/11/19 1:22 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2019-12-11 21:12:42)
Having the virtual engine handling in its own file will make it easier
call it from or modify for the GuC implementation without leaking the
changes in the context management or execlists submission paths.
No. The virtual engine is tightly coupled into the execlists, it is not
the starting point for a general veng.
-Chris
What's the issue from your POV? We've been using it with little changes
for GuC submission and IMO it flows relatively well, mainly just using a
different tasklet and slightly different cops (need to call into GuC for
pin/unpin).
Daniele
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
